• Valso@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    There are other ways to fight ads, if it comes to that. But I won’t say what they are - just in case there are spies in our ranks.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 个月前

    Internet advertising, spreading malware since the 90s. Barely do anything to hold digital advertisement networks accountable for what they distribute, not even copyright/fraudulent website cloning for servicing malware, but always ready to crack down on people trying to browse the internet more securely and always ready to make more money for the rich

  • Hauntology95@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    4 个月前

    I wonder why all these totally unrelated things in the world are going to shit? Maybe theres a common thread

    • romanticremedy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 个月前

      Yeah as if things happening in US isn’t chaotic enough. I wonder if that send signal to the world that it’s okay to be suppress all rights suddenly

      • Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 个月前

        The news is about to report on another US approved massacre in gaza, quick someone file a new form to spy on person communications, get that money transferred we said we didn’t have and for the love of god get some children in here we’re getting hungry.

      • Hauntology95@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 个月前

        People still look at me like I’m some sort of conspiracy theorist when I say that it’s all connected back to capitalism

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 个月前

          Most people are just in denial. The left has been calling out capitalism as the problem for over a century

          There was just a decent period in the middle there for the west that put a lot of people into complacency, but finally we’re starting to approach the logical conclusions of capitalism again, and it’s all coming crashing down

          Unfortunately I strongly believe that things are going to get much worse before they get better. I think the vast majority will need to be shocked into action

        • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 个月前

          A friend of mine recently called me more brainwashed than anyone for questioning capitalism and said how can I question a system that gives me bread and butter.

          When I tried to point out that the system does not give me food by the goodness of it’s heart but rather extracts something out of me in return, he pointed out that Milton Friedman was a staunch supporter of capitalism and there is no way I can know more than him.

          But the truth is, the world is crumbling. And I had rather believe what is unfolding before my own eyes than an economics textbook from 1970s (not to mention, that unlike say math economics isn’t that objective a field. Just like he purported a free market supporting Economist, I too can forward names of folks who support the opposite POV).

          The day folks stop seeing themselves as temporarily embarrassed millionaires would be awakening.

          • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            4 个月前

            Milton Friedman was a staunch supporter of capitalism and there is no way I can know more than him.

            Einstein supported socialism. You think you’re smarter than Einstein???

          • pirat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 个月前

            Is there any hope of asking when the most prosperous period of the USA was and what economic policies were used to create those conditions? Keynesian policies during the new deal - which are a tad different from MF’s.

            • Zanathos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 个月前

              Easily the 90s when Clinton wiped the USA debt away to a clean slate, and Bush immediately made it worse with Iraq in his next term. I’m speaking loosley, but assume that’s when this all started based on your question.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 个月前

      WEF Agenda from years ago. Which governments are using as guidelines.

      State Censorship with the help of Corps. heading toward Digital IDs.

      This is from their site, and what their white paper entails to aim for as a goal to have a central ID that can be used to easily keep track (read: doxx you) via everything you do, and about you. As it will be connected to everything, including social media, obviously. What we are seeing is the slow normalisation of this. With the goal being fully there by 2030 at the latest. Albeit I have seen 2027 being thrown around for some partial goals.

      So, no privacy, for control… Sorry, to protect you and your convenience. Yeah, that. Believe me, bro. Will never be abused. Promise.

      Central Bank Digital Currencies, over cash. Due to Dystopian levels of granular digital control over the currency. Friends from the bank I used to work on the IT side have already been getting briefed that these are coming down the pipe, eventually. This was done in late 2024. These things are slow to test and implement and take time but they are coming.

      Resource management that will become intrusive in your every day, via smart everything and endless bureaucracy.

      Less purchases and owning, more subscription models in absolutely everything that is possible.

      Essentially technocrats larping as activists who “care” about society, for grift and profit.

      • Hauntology95@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 个月前

        This is pretty crazy how its been in the open for so long but when you talk to people about the WEF they look at you like you’re telling them the world is flat, Its in the open for all to see but everyone has their heads in the sand and wont realise until its too late, i mean it is already. As it seems alot of these things in the diagram and what you’ve said has already come true.

        I cannot describe in accurate enough words how terrified this makes me for the future and how apathetic people will be to it.

        • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 个月前

          Yeah, it has been quite in the open. I used to be like those people until one day, I decided to stop being dumb and actually go take a closer look at the WEF and simply read between the lines and analyse how some of their policies would actually look if implemented in real life. All the WEF cliches are correct.

          But people are gullible and busy with their lives. The WEF and their proxies will lie because of course they will. And the average person is not going to go to the WEF site, read pages upon pages of white papers and read past the BS, cheery marketing and DEI coat they put over absolutely everything. The WEF may be cocky and have tons of self-righteous greedy, technocratic psychopaths but certainly they aren’t that stupid to spell it out directly.

          The white paper I got that picture from is all about inclusivity and DEI, while literally stating between the lines that they want to control and be able to monitor everything you do… For inclusivity, you see. It is almost insulting.

          Besides many people in power are WEF members and they will for sure deny or say it is a conspiracy theory despite them pushing for WEF-like policies.

          For example, up here in Canada. Trudeau was a graduate of the WEF’s Young Leaders Program, so he is all bought in. His Deputy PM/Finance Minister, Freeland, she was in the WEF’s Board. The leader of the other Left leaning, somewhat Socialist party, Singh, he was also a WEF member. Both parties formed a coalition to push a number of WEF-like policies. So is Macron of France, so was the Ex-PM of New Zealand, just to name some more.

          Trudeau ended up being hated, so Freeland ran for the Leadership of the Liberal Party and lost to Mark Carney. Oh, look, our newly minted PM, annointed by the Liberal Party to be their leader, as he had never once run for Political office or was voted in by anyone in the public… Carney is literally a member of the WEF’s Board of Trustees, the highest echelon within he WEF, besides the Schwab himself. What are the chances of that? Do we think he is going to push pro WEF-like policies? Yes or Yes?

          Just questioning why some in the highest circles of Canadian Politics are all WEF members is already something to be questioned. Given that Schwab has years ago l, openly and mockingly stated that he had infiltrated the Cabinets of many countries. Well, he ain’t lying.

          Lastly, check this presentation from the WEF I came across and the glee this presenter has for tech that will monitor your brain waves at wotk, just to see how productive you should be. Pure Dark Mirror stuff:

          ⭐ Ready for Brain Transparency? #WEF23 #Davos


          Bargain Privacy.

          ‘Workplace surveillance’ is a current practice aimed to increase and is expected, at least by some, to become a standard across industries. Such as, scanning your brainwaves -I am not kidding- during work, and thus monitor what you are doing and what type of thoughts you are having at all times. On this WEF presentation, they touch on thought and mental privacy, and cognitive liberty as issues to be tackled. Also, brain transparency policies where your work or even governments should inform you of what they are recording from you. Perhaps you may not want to be in a workplace where your brainwaves are constantly monitored yet, the Presenter wants and believes, this practice to become ubiquitous and that it is good, for your safety, fight crime and profit. When the question is, should we want this at all? Or outside narrow fields like say, practical medical uses? Do you want your brainwaves recorded by your employer or government agencies?

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 个月前

    Mozilla guy saying there’s a risk, but i dont really see it, myself.

    Firstly, does copyright really prevent modification for personal use? I dont think it does.

    Secondly, you’re not so much modifying the content as not consuming part of it. I think thats an important distinction for the court to grapple with.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 个月前

      Logic and reason never stopped monied forces from twisting the letter and spirit of the law to suit their own desires.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        Sorry, I think that’s a fairly American take.

        Money can exert influence on law makers, sure.

        In my experience here in Australia though, courts are pretty good at interpreting the law without undue influence.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 个月前

    “The EU recognizes the right of users to choose what content they receive, including the ability to block unwanted advertising.”

    what happened to our privacy rights? Are they being dismantled in order for giant tech companies to take a foothold in controlling the masses? I mean that’s what we get when we elect a self-proclaimed “transatlantist” chancellor. Fuck Merz and his blackrock cronies

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 个月前

    This is grounded in the assertion that a website’s HTML/CSS is a protected computer program that an ad blocker intervenes in the in-memory execution structures (DOM, CSSOM, rendering tree), this constituting unlawful reproduction and modification.

    This would also ban Dark Mode features and extensions.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 个月前

    Honestly, ban advertising entirely. It shits in your brain and slowly ruins everything. Even perfectly profitable businesses go - what if we made all the money, and fucked our customers’ eyeballs?

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 个月前

    I can literally open up the development console and manually click an ad, and delete it. Am I now hacking and sabotaging a protected program?

    WTF is this for nonsense, what mental gymnastics…?

    • Karna@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 个月前

      I just increased the font size on their website. By "their logic, I should be sued as well :D

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 个月前

      Only if you delete it before the script runs through its entirety and before you watch the ad. Doubt they actually care what you do after the fact.

      Mental gymnastic Olympic, indeed. However, the reason the case is back under a lower court is because the upper court stated that the case was thrown out too quickly and without all facts being properly reviewed.

      So, it seems --hopefully – that it is more of a legal clerical/procedural issue rather than the fact that Corp. argument carries any actual water, or logic, for that matter.

  • tekato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 个月前

    If that lawsuit is successful then I’ll be next in line suing security camera companies for disrupting my breaking and entering business.