The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Facepalm@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoMay 16thmedia.piefed.worldimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1377arrow-down122
arrow-up1355arrow-down1imageMay 16thmedia.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Facepalm@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up32·3 months agoWhile this problem is dumb, you could eliminate the class of user errors by having months be selected by name
minus-squareVitoRobles@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down2·3 months agoTechnically, we can eliminate this class of user errors by holding up YYYY-MM-DD as the one true method of dating and smite the nonbelievers.
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 months agoWe’re generally not allowed to smite the end users at work, satisfying as that may have been. We can mostly just hope to keep that standard within the codebase, and seek alternative means of eliminating error classes for end users
minus-squarehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 months agoNew month names just dropped: Joctober Novemy Deculyary Febrarch Munepril Septanugust
While this problem is dumb, you could eliminate the class of user errors by having months be selected by name
Technically, we can eliminate this class of user errors by holding up YYYY-MM-DD as the one true method of dating and smite the nonbelievers.
We’re generally not allowed to smite the end users at work, satisfying as that may have been.
We can mostly just hope to keep that standard within the codebase, and seek alternative means of eliminating error classes for end users
deleted by creator
New month names just dropped:
No Smarch?
Perfection
Ah yes the month of febroctougust
Oh no