• Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Calling the military “defense” has always been doublespeak. Its literally the opposite of what they do. Department of war is the correct term.

    Obviously this administration are all monsters, and they’re changing the name because they think they think it sounds intimidating. But the name change is the one good thing this administration has done, clearly in error.

    • DNS@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      DoD uses to be called DoW, but was changed to give a better image of the country. Reverting back to DoW under this administration, is not the good sign people think it is.

      Also, that joke Pete Hegseth can’t even do a proper pull up, let alone a chin up. Pathetic.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Department of war is the correct term.

      I’m reminded of when Google took the “Don’t Be Evil” motto off their homepage.

      Yeah, it was corporate bullshit. Yeah, they’ve been up to no good for a while. But when you start changing out the “We’re just here to do a good job” curtains for the “They’re red so the bloodstains are less visible” ones, it can’t help but make you a little nervous.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was thinking maybe the American public will start to question why we are spending so much on war. It is an insane budget and the doublespeak of it being for defense helped selling the idea to the public. Maybe he accidentally did something will will help reign in our over spending on war…

      • lemonaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hate that my Q family will believe exactly this: that he did it with the goal of waking people up.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I can see him stumble into some progressive policies…He will kill the economy and have enough of an outrage about cutting Medicaid that enough of his supporters will demand trumpcare. He can also start trump bucks, a monthly payout, so that the economy will still be stimulated. Just pitch it to him as something he can take away from US citizens, if they protest against him. He loves his name on shit, so just name the policies after him and he’ll probably think it’s a good deal.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was thinking maybe the American public will start to question why we are spending so much on war.

        To Keep Us Safe! To Defeat The Foreign Evil! To Bring Godlessness Back To Our Broken World!

        It is an insane budget

        I would be more comfortable with the US government taking its $1.4T national security budget and throwing it in a big burn pit than I am with our current policy. I’m less concerned with the volume of money than in what it is being spent on.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      A couple engagements against Mexico and clobbered the absolute hell out of the geriatric of the Spanish Empire at the turn of the century. I would also go so far as to say European powers did essentially nothing against the Empire of Japan during WW2, but the Chinese fought a nasty decade long war against the Japanese with serious technical and military support from the US. The Pacific theater was essentially the US Naval Department (Navy and Marines) vs the Japanese Naval Department while the bulk of both Armies were preoccupied in different theaters.

      • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mmm, have to disagree on the European powers not doing anything against Japan. While true that the island hopping campaign of MacArthur was the majority of what was going on, the British forces were heavily engaged in the China Burma India theatre which was a nasty, nasty ground war that helped keep the Nationalist Chinese in the fight by delivering supplies via the Burma road and over the “hump” by air.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    did they officially change it from defense? that might be the first honest thing they’ve done in their miserable lives in pursuit of fascistic grandstanding.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      My first split-second initial reaction was “oh hey they’re being honest for once”, but that was very swiftly followed by “oh fuck what are they teeing up here, they’re not doing this for no reason”

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think they are just trying to start some wars so Trump can stay in power. Probably in central america? They did just sink a boat / murdered some people there.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Trump has been calling himself a war-time president (the war is unspecified) and saying how nice it would be if he could suspend elections and stay in power due to a war. This has been in the making for a while. If he’s still alive in 3 years, he’ll start a war to stay in power.

    • zzz711@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right now it’s an alternate name via executive order. Officially changing the name from Department of Defense to Department of War requires an act of Congress.

  • philosloppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    the thing to do here is to continue referring to it as the DoD. I know that nobody of any consequence will do anything that could be construed as interesting but a person can dream

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine making “I’m the secretary of war of the most well funded military the world has ever known” as your whole personality. Sad, pathetic, get a hobby, get a real job

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Those were the Losing Wars that were started by the bad stupid democrats.

      He’s going to do the Winning Wars that Make America Great Again.

      Yuge difference.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    So Donald or anyone in his family are going to do their service now then?

    Right?