• HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh, were back to this? Feel like it’s been a decade since this was all in the spotlight. Haven’t watched it yet, but has anything changed, or is it the same stuff as before? I actually was wondering not too long ago what happened to them because, at least for me, I didn’t hear anything about them for years now.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have seen plants sold in shops with warnings that you can’t propagate them. Dunno why because it was so easy to do.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve seen that, but I always assumed they meant you couldn’t take a cutting from a plant in the store without buying the whole plant, which, I feel like that’s fair. Trying to prevent people from propagating their own plants after they’ve paid for them is asinine though.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s like the start of a movie having a disclaimer about “You wouldn’t download a car!!!”

      Pirate the seeds. And seed them for others.

    • november@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been looking into this a little more and apparently Carey Gillam is buddy-buddy with RFK Jr. So I’m not sure how much I trust her.

      Still, I had no idea Monsanto was responsible for Agent Orange. Learning that was enough to make watching this video worth it. Still, as with any other topic, you’ll want to look for multiple resources.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s nothing wrong with genetically modifying foods. The problem is the exploitative legal contracts that they come with.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t think that it’s unreasonable to expect to recoup the millions you spent on R&D for developing a new crop.

        Yes, the length of ownership should be much shorter, but until the world governments collapse, technological advancements cost money and resources.

        If you remove the ability to recoup R&D costs before addressing the need for private r&d at all, you’re going to stifle innovation.

        This isn’t an endorsement for the current system, but these processes will continue to exist until the current system is replaced.

        • RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of r&d came from any sort of university program or study at the facilities by any graduate or undergrads we already paid for the r&d more than likely it’s like when the government sold means and military vehicles vans gear to local cops we already paid once for it the first time and we are getting charged again

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can argue that until you’re blue in the face and it won’t mean shit.

            While the system of government these drugs/crops are developed under is capitalist, we’re stuck with the same shit.

            This is an instance of “don’t hate the player, hate the game.”

            • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s totally reasonable to hate the players. The game can’t continue without players. Legality is NOT morality.

            • Hetare King@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              I will hate the game and the player, thank you very much. Even under this system, other choices could have been made that are neither illegal or financially nonviable, so Monsanto is very much responsible for the choices they did make. They’re not victims of the systems, they’re gleefully pursuing everything the system lets them get away with.

              Of course, if you want things to change, it is indeed changes to law and government incentives that need to be pursued. But in order for that to happen, you need enough people to get upset about the current state of things, and for that you need concrete examples. And it doesn’t get more concrete than this.

  • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The farmers caught replanting seeds time and time again have been shown to intentionally skirt the rules.

      • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry to interrupt your circle jerk.

        The reality is farmers could use their own seeds. They don’t because Monsanto saves them money and updates the seeds year to year to optimize with changing conditions.

        The “Oh your seeds fertilized mine and I can’t do anything about it” is bullshit.

        Frankly fresh inexpensive and healthy meals are available at rock bottom prices in the state for over 85% of the population. Our local grocery stores would make kings and sultans enraged with jealousy. I have little issue with the American and Western food chain. Monsanto whether you like it or not contributes heavily to it’s success.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Imagine how much cheaper food would be if Monsanto wasn’t constantly hitting farmers over the head with a legal club

        • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No, there is no question of Monsanto’s greed here. This what capitalism does, it incentivizes greed over sustainability.

          Rather than requiring farmers to dump saved seeds and purchase new patented seeds each year, they could use a licensing system with a fair royalty on crop yields so that farmers do not have to take on the massive administrative burden of ensuring Monsanto seeds/crops don’t mix with non Monsanto ones (because if they don’t do this, they’ll get sued into oblivion). Those that have a license can use saved seeds from the prior year.

          This is the corporation that said Round Up was “safer than table salt” and “practically nontoxic” to mammals, birds and fish. The International Agency for Research on Cancer recognizes Round Up as a probable human carcinogen at sufficiently high exposures.

          Monsanto also supplied the US government with Agent Orange during the Vietnam war which, as we all know, caused countless cases of cancer among US war veterans and the people of Vietnam.

          Fuck Monsanto.