- cross-posted to:
- leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- cross-posted to:
- leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Cross-posted from “ideas are not property, they cannot be stolen” by @_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus in !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
No, but work on realizing those ideas can certainly be undermined.
This is a great example of modern Internet “either one thing or what I randomly decide is its opposite is correct”.
Absolutely modern copyright is broken and unfit for purpose, absolutely the ability to correctly assign authorship is useful, absolutely there is value to exclusive monetization rights for authors, certainly the ability to assign those to corporations is overexploited in the current model.
All of those things are true at once and I’m pretty sure the unavoidable overhaul of a trillion dollar conglomerate of industrial and cultural dependencies worldwide is not going to end up fitting in a meme.
Truth.
The current system certainly is, but something like CC BY-SA seems to me to be fair. You shouldn’t get unlimited exploitation of ideas, stories, etc., but attribution is hardly onerous and seems deserved.
Copyright is a game we play to provide monetary incentive for making stuff, because making is hard and copying is easy.
Which means that even if you’re a fan of this game - when there’s no money involved, fuck off.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
Don’t accept the enemy’s framing of the issue.
Eh, We’d rather not listen to a misogynist creep (Stallman).
yikes.
Lol, just accept the enemy’s framing of the issue. Your life will be so much more serene!
We do not support either ip or stallman, that site defending stallman reads the typical right wing"objective" etc bullshit, or at least patriarchal rhetoric. Maybe don’t sound like that if you want us to believe you.
Besides, we have seen first hand what stallman has said, we don’t believe he is somebody worth listening to.






