• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    And just like how online e-commerce went away when the speculative companies went broke, surely when this market corrects AI will vanish and everything will go back to exactly how it was before.

    • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What? Who gives a shit if AI vanishes or not. The greedy turds manipulating markets and raking in the money now won’t be the ones facing the consequences; that will fall on the rest of us peasants.

      • tal@olio.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re confident that a given company is overvalued by existing investors, you can sell it short, make money off that assessment.

        That being said, if you’re wrong, you can lose money doing the same.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem with that is market value is decided by some arcane process that sane people can’t comprehend, by which I mean it goes up not if the company grows or makes new/better things but if people with a vested interest believe they can sell it later for a return, similary a materially successful business can go down in flames because a hedgefund decided to bet against it and then make it pay for its own buyout forcing a bankruptcy.

  • aarch0x40@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Everyone look out, the banks have made their money so it’s time to dump on the poors again.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      the banks only make money after the crash, when people can’t pay their loans.

      then they have to find baggers for the property they seize, only if they cant flip those in time do they come out ahead

      • aarch0x40@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Investment banks and the primary equity market. They’ve already traded their long positions for shorts

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Of course, if that’s like in the last Crash, it relies on the Government saving their counterparties so that they can pay them, like the Obama Administration saved AGI so that Goldman Sachs could make lots of money from the Crash as that company was their main counterparty.

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            do you have any sources of information/history on this whole fucked up game you’d recommend reading?

            trying to learn everything I can about this fucked up system we’ve built for ourselves here, so I can use it against itself in the hopes of trying to break this cycle.

            ever since learning the (real) fundamentals of how the stock market works I’v been making a killing, don’t plan on playing it any longer than I absolutely have to…but sadly for someone in my position it is the only way for me to get the capital I need to move on some of these greedy assholes who think their exploitive “positions” are unshakable.

            • aarch0x40@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I took the FINRA Series 7. It’s the entry level exam all those who work in financial services take. It’s pretty enlightening and highlights how every service is pretty much the same with slightly different applications. Banks cheating everyone with money that they convince others existed before it was asked for. One doesn’t need to take the exam to take a course in it though.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Try the books “This Time Is Different” and “The Black Swan”, they’re both high level views on things, the former being about the History of Economic Crashes (and the common folly of thinking that this time is different), so mainly an Economics take, whilst the latter is a Finance Industry point of view about how the 2008 Crash ended up happening and the reactions to, it from a guy who made a lot of money from predicting it.

              Might also want to read “Freaknomics” (a book from the Behavioural Economics area, which is maybe the only part of Economics that actually follows the Scientific Method) for a view of how humans actually behave in Economics/Financial domains which thoroughly disproves (not by trying it but simply because it’s what logically follows from the experiments they conducted on human economics behaviours) the complete total bollocks which is Homo Economicus that’s used as foundation of most of the mathematical building which justifies the Free Market Theories so beloved of Neoliberals.

              The rest I mainly know it from living through it and following the more Finance specialist news and following a forum (whose name totally evades me) which had a lot of Finance Industry members (so a lot of the posts there were clearly from the kind of person who knows concepts like “discounted value of money” rather than opinionated non-experts) and was towards the Libertarian and Goldbugs side, before it got swamped by Preppers and other such far-right American sub-culture members.

              I’ve been outside the Industry for almost a decade now, so I bet that beyond awareness of the (real) fundamentals of Markets and how the Industry operates, I’m less well informed about what’s going on right now than you are.

          • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            like the Obama Administration saved AGI

            If Obama saved the AGI why we have to deal with the crappy LLMs? ;p

    • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      "Here’s Why This Is Bad

      I dunno man, let’s start simple: $50 billion a quarter of data center funding is going into an industry that has less revenue than Genshin Impact. That feels pretty bad."

      -My favorite quote from this blog post

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The dotcom peak was over a massive number of companies that folded, here it’s pretty much just a few companies.

    Now they may be talking about a lot of rich assholes that would be directly affected by the bubble bursting if they’re actual evangelists of hallucinating LLMs but I guess I don’t see that massive impacts that this AI BS has over the dotcom crash had where jobs were massively lost over a span of a few months.

  • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to everyone to think about this, because I am very old. I have lived through many bubble bursts, I have lived through the recession. I think the most adept comparison to AI is when companies got this idea to do outsourcing. They outsourced EVERYTHING. Call centers, data development, manufacturing. It didn’t work after a few years of the hype it came back to the US. We found equilibrium. Yes there is still some outsourcing but it’s more globalization. AI will have the same thing. It will probably hang on a few more years then things will shuffle back to humanity. The difference then is there were still minimum wage increases on a federal level and it does concern me that there hasn’t been since my youth. It was a regular normal thing in my youth.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guys but a very smart person on LinkedIn said they discovered the formula E = MC² + AI

    How could it be a bubble if the universe depends on it?

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    This should not come as a surprise to anybody. Not because of AI specifically, but because this is how tech hype always works. The more hype the bigger the crash.

  • ODGreen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn’t it bigger than the subprime mortgage bubble by this point?

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Substantially bigger, but that’s not the whole story. Subprime mortgages were interconnected to everything banks did. The AI bubble isn’t quite so connected in the same way.

      Compare this to the Chinese property sector bubble. Around 2020/2021, there were a lot of stories about how China had created a huge bubble and was going to take down everyone when it popped. Instead, it just sorta fizzled out, at least from an outsiders perspective. China has usually kept away foreign investment in their real estate market (along with pretty much all their big companies). There just wasn’t that much fallout to be had outside of China. Tons of doom headlines popped up in Western media, but it was a nothingburger unless you were somehow embedded in the Chinese real estate market.

      Let me be clear: the AI bubble popping will hurt. At this point, there’s no way out of it, and it needs to pop sooner rather than later. However, comparisons to the 2008 financial crisis don’t tell the whole story.

      • ElegantBiscuit@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah the financial crisis bankrupted the banks themselves. The structural foundation of the financial and banking industries were interconnected to bad mortgages that were distributed into financial instruments everywhere and speculated on like crazy by everyone, because they were mortgages and considered safe like bonds. Part of the reason why companies like GM went bankrupt was because their financial arm was significantly invested in mortgages, banks failed because their entire financial model was centered on mortgage returns, and people defaulted on houses en masse because they were allowed to get mortgages they were never able to afford.

        But no one investing in stocks, particularly tech stocks, is doing so without explicitly gambling that money. A lot of venture capital might collapse, retail investors are going to get shit on, the general economy will slow as it does during a recession, but mostly this will play out like the dotcom bubble and be a large asset correction in the stock market. A few years of correction, consolidation of the industry, and everyone will pile onto the next bubble in a decade.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      this is definitely gonna be a big one, always is when there’s blatant fraud making front page news regularly. and the wolves are running the show for the forseeable future so it’ll probably keep on going…

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      that 100bn recently invested its going to have to be repaid somewhere. and nvidia doesnt want to hold the bag.