• Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      Amateur marketing speak for “we’re considering bringing it to other hardware”?

      • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not marketing speak because GrapheneOS didn’t say it. It’s a bad headline from a site known for bad reporting. GrapheneOS has been talking about this for months and there’s nothing new in this article that wasn’t already out there.

        • Brewchin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          No need to defend it. It was obviously a comment on the headline; I didn’t care who wrote it - the criticism was directed at whomever vomited it up. Tech publications are as much uncritical PR agencies for tech companies as the latter’s marketroids are.

          • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I was trying to clarify, not defend. It is absolute garbage and this article as a whole is a pile of nothing, written in a weird breathless style like they just discovered something. Thumbs down to this shit all around.

  • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hope they also enhance their social media strategy, as their unprofessional and aggressive way of communication makes me question their trustworthiness more than I want, as I think the project is awesome.

      • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you want a direct example you can check their replies on Mastodon to about every topic.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They shit on other projects all the time (frequently unprovoked, sometimes without the original conversation having anything to do about security). They also often reply with multiple posts with multiple paragraphs each when shitting on other projects. It shouldn’t take very long to find an example if you trawl through their replies on Twitter, Bluesky, or Mastodon.

        They have good points, but they’re often either not relevant to the conversation or worded in such a way that it sounds like every project other than GrapheneOS is dogshit.

        They also sometimes go on (IMO) paranoid rants about XYZ project systematically trying to destroy them or whatever.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I got the same vibes when they describe in detail how supposedly terrible Firefox on Android is for security. I actually didn’t believe them just based on the tone.

          • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean, I think they’re right that the security is worse. I’m pretty sure it’s worse on desktop too, just not nearly as bad. Last I checked, Firefox on Android still doesn’t do per-site process isolation by default, for example.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Seriously. I love GOS and can’t imagine using a phone without it at this point, but their social media is a shitshow and a half.

    • jobbies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep. They need an actual comms professional. I love GOS and am forever grateful to the team but having a bunch of non-nuero-typical devs speaking for them is not doing them any favours.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      For me, it would be the opposite. Their “unprofessional” and aggressive way of communications makes me think they are doing it for convictions rather then personal benefits. The person that’s helping you doesn’t need to be overly polite. The person trying to get something out of you does.

      • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I got heavily attacked for basically nothing like a year ago, which made me feel really bad and I still think about it frequently. Whoever treats people like this does not gain a lot of trust from me. Also such impulsiveness should not be involved in such a project. No one needs to be overly polite but also not that hostile against people and like 90% of other projects out there.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sorry, maybe I just did not see how bad it gets. I don’t follow their communications in detail. I wanted to say that being a bit aggressive is fine, but if it was really to the point of attacking you, than that is not ok either.

  • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Imagine, they announce a Chinese phone brand, like Huawei or Xiaomi. Although that Xiaomi 17 Pro Max… damn.

    • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because only Google provided everything needed to actually fully support the hardware it runs on. Besides, hardware is just the skeleton, as long as you exchange the brains inside, you are fine. Like a bomb shell but empty inside.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 months ago

    Break free, implying they won’t support Pixels anymore (is how I interpreted it at first anyway), but they are simply expanding support for more devices. 👍

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      For existing Pixel users, GrapheneOS plans to maintain support for current devices until their end-of-life dates. The team is working on adding Pixel 10 support, though the timeline remains unclear. Whether they’ll support Pixel 11 and beyond hasn’t been decided yet.

    • zerakith@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 months ago

      The article suggests that they have not decided whether to support new models of Pixel but will support current models until EOL