“I am pleased with the results on the border.”
How are these people calling themselves Christians?
This is where unlucky asylum seekers have to stay between 2 days to more than half a year. People entering as legally.
You can’t bring any items like a book inside and you can’t leave except for food time in cafetaria like some prison with no yard-time. Just sit still and sleep until we process your papers in 4 months.
Ours had walls instead of cage thankfully but toilet was inside with no door. This was the conditions in 2018.
“Pleased” said the love-thy-neighbor Christian, “satisfied.”
How are these people calling themselves Christians?
It starts with portraying Jesus as a white dude…
How are these people calling themselves Christians?
Where did they call themselves Christians?
IMO, it takes a special type of double-think to believe that what ICE is doing is loving our neighbors. I sincerely hope they are not actually Christian.
Maybe not these people specifically, but most of the GOP base identifies as Christian.
66% is most.
A lot of those areas are under 60%. If you exclude the two top categories (evangelical Protestant and Mormon), it’s much closer to 50/50.
The real problem IMO is the evangelicals Protestants. Those are much more based around influential individuals (megachurches/TV preachers) rather than community or religious tenants.
The infographic makes no claim about the size of each group, just the left/right split within each group. You cannot draw such a conclusion from that data alone. This is a common misunderstanding in statistics when dealing with conditional probability.
Here is an infographic showing the inverse, religious affiliation given party affiliation.
This indicates both parties are majority Christian, the Republican party overwhelmingly so.
Thanks, that is a much better infographic.
Any idea why Jewish people are more predominantly Democrat than Republican?
Look at all the white oeople supporting the republicans. No surprises there
I would say that’s most.
Self-proclaimed religiousness is one of the main things for conservatives no?
That’s the beauty of it. They’re brown so they dont matter apparently
How are these people calling themselves Christians?
Anyone familiar with the history of the church can answer this.
Okay like of course this perspective is vile. I would never defend it. The people I refer to below are not the same people represented in this tweet.
But the right’s justification for anti immigration makes sense to people. Its the oldest trick in the book! Artificial scarcity? Housing crisis? Employment crisis? Some of us have a rigorous class analysis that can neatly disprove these lies, part of why red scares are such a fundamental component of the right’s culture war (a component many progressive liberals accept unquestioningly.)
But for the average person who doesnt think about stuff that way, the working/middle class swing voter who is simultaneously directly affected by economic and political oppression but deeply confused about the underlying causes, how do we convince them? The pendulum has flipped and Trumps policies are deeply unpopular, but what is the convincing explanation that the whole basis of their logic is flawed? How do we prove that immigrants aren’t the problem?
Its like in avengers, thanos says he will kill half of all people in order to end scarcity in the universe. And none of the heroes even questions his logic. The attitude is like, he’s a bad guy but it would still work. And, no it wouldn’t, scarcity in advanced society is driven by class, not population. Malthus was thoroughly disproved like 150 years ago and yet this myth persists (like the myth of immigration and race-based scarcity).
Because as long as our political strategy amounts to “shame anyone who demonstrates an affective affinity with the right, and vote” we won’t be able to resist the creeping threat of fascism. In 5-10 years it will be full on Nazi shit and I dont want to die in a concentration camp please and thank you
I think you’re trying really fucking hard to pretend that there are people there worth saving and it eats at me that your perspective is not only popular, but common.
These people are irredeemable. Their primary goals are to hurt others for their inalienable traits.
You don’t need these people. When the common opinion was such that they had to hide their shitty opinions, everyone was better off for it.
What you need, is people who don’t pay attention to pay attention. Stop focusing on the magas. You can never find compromise with them, nor convince them with reason, because all of the arguments they give are fundementally based on “I hate that person because they are the out group”.
That trumps literally everything else to them, as you are clearly seeing here. They are not outliers. Thats the common maga mentality.
You doing mental gymnastics to pretend that the common person just has to be good is a coping strategy that is killing you.
Because as long as our political strategy amounts to “shame anyone who demonstrates an affective affinity with the right, and vote”
When has that been anyones political strategy. Thats what the right says it is (instead its trying to sell people on a DNC lead democrat party that fundementally does not want to offer noteworthy change).
Firstly, we should shame them, because the right wing is demonstrably awful, and pretending it has merit does no favours. That is what the DNC wants to do, and has done for the past… very long time.
So shame is not the solution, but its also not the problem.
Instead, the problem is that an average person here’s 2 people put up some arguments, doesnt think about it further, thinks “ah well both sides” and then stops thinking.
Left leaning people often don’t help this as they screech more loudly about the party closest to actually being moldable into something positive than they do the party doing harm, which helps keep precisely the group they need to convince the most in that valley of “both people are shouting, both sides I guess” and then that person stops caring.
Also,
we won’t be able to resist the creeping threat of fascism.
Creeping threat??? You’re currently trying to fight your way out and you call it a creeping threat. Just part of the problems.
My opinion on the world is that 50% of people don’t really care all that much about anything and have an extremely mild positive bias, 30% of people are just awful, and focus more on hurting others than making things better, and then 20% are the inverse of the 30%.
Your “solution” involves somehow convincing that 30% instead of figuring out whats stopping that 50% from figuring out how this will personally affect them, and to snap out of they’re “both sides” voter apathy/general apathy delusion.
Part of the problem is that their position is self defeating. They think nothing works, everything is corrupt, and so there is no point doing anything, and that entrenches all of those problems, making them even worse.
Thats the real struggle; getting them both to see the personal threat to themselves (as they don’t care about the larger picture) and then getting them to see that they do in fact have none bloody death alternatives to that.
All of this just emphasizes how disastrous it was that the democrats folded and didn’t let people see the consequences of their actions with the government shutdown.
Wow you’re really cheesed. Like I said in my first sentence, I don’t support those views or people with those views. Ive worked with people who are do try to reach over and convince the MAGAs and frankly they’re the worst. I’m not one of them I’m asking a question about the middle, the exact folks you are talking about.
But to someone who genuinely thinks that immigration threatens their jobs, their logic based in the education they received, the news they consume, the ambient culture.
My question is how do you do that? How do you reach the people in the middle who are most affected, fearful, worried, and hence easy to manipulate ideologically?
Explain to me, a regular person just trying to get by, how immigration doesnt affect me. Convince me.
What “solution” did I even offer? I asked a fucking question. This is legit the most bad faith response ive ever received.
Is this how you engage in political discourse? You just blow up at whoever you’re talking to? Assume they are evil and stupid? Let me ask you, who are you recruiting to the cause? What real work are you doing to help people and resist fascism? Are you just getting mad at people you made up in your head? Im pretty sure you aren’t doing shit, because people who are doing the work dont act like this. Fucking relax.
Wow you’re really cheesed.
Is this how you engage in political discourse? You just blow up at whoever you’re talking to? Assume they are evil and stupid?
Fucking relax.
Jumping to trolling with the comment equivalent to “u mad bro?” while pretending to care about civility is wild.
This is legit the most bad faith response ive ever received.
This right here is straight projection, especially given clearly some others thought my comment fit perfectly/was a reasonable interpretation of yours.
What “solution” did I even offer?
Because as long as our political strategy amounts to “shame anyone who demonstrates an affective affinity with the right, and vote” we won’t be able to resist the creeping threat of fascism. In 5-10 years it will be full on Nazi shit and I dont want to die in a concentration camp please and thank you
You are clearly suggesting that not shaming the fascists is part of the solution here and now you’re feigning ignorance to having said that.
Explain to me, a regular person just trying to get by, how immigration doesnt affect me. Convince me.
and
I asked a fucking question.
Yeah, nah. Now, with the rest of the comment as context this seems more like an effort to sealion than a real question, especially with you saying:
Explain to me, a regular person just trying to get by, how immigration doesnt affect me. Convince me.
Which completely changes who you’re portraying yourself to be and asks me to waste my time with a right wing talking point that is now suddenly the focus, as if the uncaring people think this is a major point anyways.
I probably spent to much effort responding to this comment that is clearly actually in bad faith.
I mean look at this shit:
What real work are you doing to help people and resist fascism? Are you just getting mad at people you made up in your head? Im pretty sure you aren’t doing shit, because people who are doing the work dont act like this.
Pure right wing, 4chan style ragebait trolling.
One thing alone would help shift the Overton Window MASSIVELY in a country like the USA - mandatory voting. If everyone who had the right to vote actually voted, Republicans would never hold federal government ever again and would only be able to hold onto a couple of states and a few dozen local governments across the nation.
Without mandatory voting, Republicans can become more and more egregious in seeking to rally voters while simultaneously painting the whole establishment as broken which essentially disenfranchises the non-voting centre. With it, they’d have to seriously moderate their platforms to have any hope of forming government ever again. It would likely cause a party split that would then coalesce again into a two-party coalition on the right, starting the efforts to break down the two-party system.
If you introduce ranked choice voting as well, that’ll speed up the dismantling of the two-party system, but just mandatory voting alone would prevent Trump and his ilk from ever being in power again.
One thing alone would help shift the Overton Window MASSIVELY in a country like the USA - mandatory voting. If everyone who had the right to vote actually voted, Republicans would never hold federal government ever again and would only be able to hold onto a couple of states and a few dozen local governments across the nation.
The problem with “solutions” like this (and I actually don’t even think this would fix things vs any number of other solutions in a similar vein), is that these aren’t solutions. These are vague wishlist goals, and very much so have all the hard parts of getting there removed.
Like I think every country having proportional representation would improve the quality of their politicians and government massively, but good luck getting the establishment politicians who benefit from the old system to give that up.
If you introduce ranked choice voting as well,
Im always super shocked at why anyone likes ranked choice voting. It doesnt actually solve the 2 party system at all.
Proportional voting is what solves that. Ranked choice just means that 2 party system has a slightly higher chance of changing who the 2 parties are.
This is the part that always gets me laughing. At the level of effort that would be necessary to actually get voting reform, we might as well just overthrow the government. That is how difficult it would be, it would require a nationwide coordinated mass movement hitherto unseen in the United States, and it would only really solve one of our problems.
I think it would actually solve a huge swath of problems, but absolutely yes its ridiculous to state as a solution just as we both agree.
As for the overthrowing the government part, I think that given they’re both at the same levels of difficulty, Id probably opt for the one that also accomplishes the practical goals and doesnt end up in half of us being bloody pulp on the ground.
it really doesn’t. It would start the process of fixing the problems, but you then still need to take money out of politics, curb the right-wing misinformation machine, introduce and pass widespread economic, education, and equality reform, all the while billionaires will continue to do everything in their power to bribe the multitude of parties to halt progress.
If they’re both the same level of difficulty, I’d rather fix all the problems at once, rather than take step one of a hundred.
If they’re both the same level of difficulty, I’d rather fix all the problems at once
Neither fixes all the problems at once. People keep holding onto the ideas of some hail mary that wins the “game” and it aint coming.
Proportional representation would break 2 party and be one of many steps. People would be able to vote for one of many parties and no0 longer would throwing away your vote with a third party be a thing.
rather than take step one of a hundred.
Many steps is the only way to eventually fix things. Your basically faced with a highly liable to fail, bloody fictional solution you wont do, and the long, diet and exercise you swear wont work.
Cool, Trump lost me in the 2016 primaries. That was the first election I voted third party, and 2020 was the first election I voted Democrat, and I largely voted Republican before then (McCain and Romney) because I thought they cared about small, responsible and privacy-respecting government.
The warning signs were there from the start. He’s a narcissist and easily manipulated by shiny things and flattery. That type of person isn’t interested in making things better for you, only better for themselves, and someone in Trump’s position cares more about making headlines than people actually liking them.
The only thing I like about Trump is be pissed off conservatives. Everything else is a net negative including the tax cuts that actually kind of benefit me.
because I thought they cared about small, responsible and privacy-respecting government.
Sooooo you did no research whatsoever??
I was a kid, what kind of research do you expect me to do? My parents and most friends were registered GOP, so defaulting to trusting them makes sense.
Kids cant vote tho, and you indicated that you voted that way for multiple prior elections.
I considered myself a “kid” up until I had my own kid. So more a maturity designation than an age one. It took some election cycles to understand what the actual priorities are.
I grew up in a Democrat-majority state, so I naturally blamed the stupid policy choices on Democrats, and I was pissed even when a popular Republican initially won but lost after a recount “found” thousands of extra votes.
Then I moved to a Republican majority state and it had the same problems with stupid policy choices (different problems with different policies), and I realized the problem isn’t with ether party, but the two party system that essentially guarantees you’ll have poor representation.
That’s when I found libertarianism, and now I look less at party affiliation and instead try to find the least insane option. My state will elect the GOP candidate, so there’s no such thing as strategic voting on my ballot, I simply express who’s the least insane.
I considered myself a “kid” up until I had my own kid.
This arbitrary milestone that is only meaningful for you doesn’t really translate well in conversation no?
More than that, it feels like it hints at, but does not fully confirm a sort of “I didn’t care till it affected me personally” angle to it.
That’s when I found libertarianism, and now I look less at party affiliation and instead try to find the least insane option.
Ok, here I was not jumping to conclusions and then you end with libertarianism… the self defeating ideology that really translates to “Don’t tread on me, but fuck everyone else” and when asked how things will still run responds with a shrug.
This arbitrary milestone that is only meaningful for you doesn’t really translate well in conversation no?
“Kid” is an imprecise term that just means someone who is young and inexperienced, and what it means changes with context. When I went to middle school/junior high, “kid” was anyone still in elementary school. When I went to college, “kid” was anyone still in K-12. When I got my first real job after college, “kid” included most undergrads. And so on.
Here’s the first dictionary definition I found:
1
: a young personhung out with the other kids in high school
especially : child
a married couple with two kids
—often used as a generalized reference to one especially younger or less experienced
the kid on the pro golf tour
you poor kid
Yeah, it’s ambiguous, that’s kinda how language goes. It can mean anything from a baby to an old person, given context. I would hope the context here (voted multiple times) would be enough to show I wasn’t referring to an elementary school kid, but a young adult.
"I didn’t care till it affected me personally” angle to it.
Nah, it still didn’t impact me personally when I switched my mindset. I’ve had a pretty privileged life, I grew up middle class and my first job after college provided a middle class lifestyle. Not having to worry too much about housing or food meant much of government policy didn’t really impact me. Today, the most impactful policy is immigration since my SO’s family are immigrants and we’ve only been able to help with my SO’s parents.
I’m not saying I was out of touch or anything. I had friends across the income spectrum from relatively rich (dad owned a car dealership) to very poor (living off welfare), and I certainly didn’t favor the wants of the first group over the second.
I was mostly interested in efficiency. For example, I wrote an essay in high school about privatizing social security (i.e. defined contribution like an IRA rather than defined benefit like a pension) because I was interested in stocks and saw stocks had much higher returns than Social Security payouts. Local politics was very inefficient, and I blamed that on the dominant party. I grew up near Seattle, and as a kid, there were a ton of cancelled rail and monorail projects, mostly in the Seattle area, and any of them would’ve helped alleviate traffic. They spent millions on these projects before killing them, and meanwhile traffic on the highways continued to get worse and investment outside Seattle continued to languish. And then when they finally built some rail lines, it didn’t really solve traffic (made getting to the Mariners stadium easier…) and they had a separate line for the airport that didn’t connect to the commuter line, making it only narrowly useful. Around that time, I had family in Utah and they could take the train to the airport, downtown for shopping, and to the local university, and that was across three lines with many transfers between them.
Young me saw Democrats as inefficient and eager to spend, and Republicans as stubborn but efficient. The reality is that both parties suck when they have a massive majority, and they don’t really work well together if there’s a shot one could have a majority in the next election. In Utah, they’ve talked about a light rail extension for well over a decade that would increase daily ridership by almost 50% and give an alternative to a congested area, and in that time they built a short rail segment to a relatively wealthy area (~1/10 the daily ridership of the other propsal) and will build a short extension before reconsidering it. That’s not left/right thing since they prioritized a liberal area over a conservative one.
end with libertarianism…
Then your understanding of libertarianism is misguided. It’s a big tent, with everything from socialists who adore Marx to the far right who want a Mad Max style free-for-all, and you seem to be talking about the second group.
I’m personally somewhere in the middle, and certainly left of the Libertarian Party in the US. I was attracted by the idea of the NAP guiding decisions, and I think people are generally better off with more freedom rather than less. Here are some policies I support:
- Negative Income Tax - like UBI, but only for people under a certain income; goal would be to get everyone above the poverty line, and it wouldn’t be super expensive (this guy claims $168B); I’d prefer to repurpose Social Security for this, but that’s an uphill battle
- end qualified immunity and hold law enforcement, representatives, and the President accountable
- more pigouvian taxes rather than regulations, such as a tax on alcohol to fund rehab, carbon taxes to clean up the air, etc; anything not covered should largely come from property taxes rather than income
- expand school choice by replacing school buses with city buses in metro areas, and encourage schools to specialize
- eliminate federal student loans, expand Pell grants, and replace most other functions of the Department of Education with an independent group that assesses school performance across states
- mandatory balanced budget
And so on. I want better, more efficient services, and I think the libertarian perspective is the right way to find that balance.
“Kid” is an imprecise term that just means someone who is young and inexperienced
I think most people assume it means under 18.
Yeah, it’s ambiguous, that’s kinda how language goes. It can mean anything from a baby to an old person, given context.
Sure, but this context was about voting age people. That was the whole context.
I would hope the context here (voted multiple times) would be enough to show I wasn’t referring to an elementary school kid, but a young adult.
You were still using it as an excuse for not paying attention though.
Today, the most impactful policy is immigration since my SO’s family are immigrants and we’ve only been able to help with my SO’s parents.
This sounds directly like it impacts you.
The reality is that both parties suck when they have a massive majority
This type of bothsiderism indicates that you still don’t pay attention when you refuse to see nuance past this.
That’s not left/right thing since they prioritized a liberal area over a conservative one.
Providing better things to richer people isnt a left/right thing??? You basically choose to stick your head in the sand is what it sounds like.
Then your understanding of libertarianism is misguided.
I highly doubt this.
It’s a big tent, with everything from socialists
Nope.
Here are some policies I support:
Almost none of these policies are actually supported by any libertarian politicians.
expand school choice by replacing school buses with city buses in metro areas, and encourage schools to specialize
This sounds dangerously close to privatizing schools, especially where we’re talking about basic education necessary for life (K-12)
eliminate federal student loans, expand Pell grants, and replace most other functions of the Department of Education with an independent group that assesses school performance across states
Sounds dangerous and vague, once again, almost like privatizing education by replacing a government agency.
mandatory balanced budget
This sounds pipe dream like. Everyone dreams of such a thing, and itll happen right after the US switches to a proportional representation system.
Really, Im getting the impression, that like many conservatives (including the ones who call themselves libertarians), you’re presenting a prettied up, as clean as possible sounding list of policies that with a little bit of digging reveals that its all headed towards the classic libertarian problems where these ideas only work if everyone is assumed to act in good faith, and somehow privatization is more efficient than a government doing things.
That right there is a wedge that can be opened. (Not be someone who comes across as being left-wing, who they’ll likely reject out of hand, mind).
The seed of doubt has been sown, and now it remains to be asked just how kidnapping brown people (phrasing it that way won’t work but I’m not currently trying to convince anyone…) benefits them, personally. It’s an opportunity to examine the disconnect between things they feel are connected - “everything is shit and I don’t have enough money” and “there’s too many foreigners and brown people”.
I’ve been trying something similar for years:
“They took our jerbs!” “You lost your job to an immgrant?” “Well, no, but…” “Who do you know that has lost their job to an immigrant?” “Well, personally no one, but that’s not the point!” “…”
I lost my job to overseas Indians and I don’t blame them one lick. Blame the capitalists sending those jobs overseas.
You can’t rehabilitate these people. What you can do is make them feel betrayed so they point in the right direction, then later shame them back into keeping their racist bullshit buried deep down
They’re never going to fully accept that ethnic cleansing is wrong, or even that it wouldn’t accomplish their goals, but they can be made to understand it’s not socially acceptable to share those opinions
And doing that makes them even think about it less. But deep down, people who cheer these camps and ICE raids will always be deeply racist and lacking in compassion. This isn’t ignorance, this is naked desire for an enthnostate.
That degree of racism will always be there, and must always be kept under the surface by social pressure
Some people are like that, but some aren’t. Some people are convinced to hate a group because of lies, propaganda and confirmation bias. When the lies start to be exposed, it can also start to unravel the hatred.
It can be difficult to expose lies in a way that is convincing, especially nowadays when media is so polarised, so people from another camp are likely to think you are lying if you challenge their existing beliefs. But this is obviously an example of people starting to realise they’ve been lied to nevertheless.
When the lies start to be exposed, it can also start to unravel the hatred.
If this were the case with MAGA, they would have stopped supporting Trump years ago.
These people are in a cult. Simply pointing out lies isn’t enough.
You assume that the things that informed you of trump’s lies were heard and found convincing by all the magas. Here’s living proof that people are capable of understanding, eventually.
Did you even read what they said, they’re still fucking fascists.
It’s a mixed bag, as the other commenter said.
Not American, but news here have been focusing heavily and specifically on immigrants instances of crime for years, pushing often the same talking points Fox News uses; it affects people’s perception of reality, they feel threatened and they are given no perspective on how prevalent it actually is or the systemic reasons why.
Now that doesn’t justify the hate they display, but many could be led to reason if the outside pressure leveraging their ignorance stopped.
It is a mixed bag, but the people who can be saved don’t think these things are related - they think ICE are going after criminals
They don’t think ethnic cleansing is the answer, they just think this is about crime
That’s when you find out it’s not about belief, it’s about tribalism. It’s essentially a religion (or a cult).
Their friends are idiots. The people they look up to are idiots. It’s extremely difficult to separate someone from their “tribe” because that’s where they feel safest.
You can use logic and reality with them only until they run back to is their faith.
Americanism is a new religion. Good luck reasoning with it.
Appropriately enough the phrase “seed of doubt” is often used in religious contexts :)
I missed the ANTIFA riots. I guess Evan and I don’t get our news from the same sources.
It’s amazing that this administration is so spectacularly bad that even its propaganda machine can’t hide it.
Did you not see the dancing dinosaurs, grannies, naked cyclists, and the chicken man viciously intimidating Kristi Nome?
It’s awful out there. Truly terrifying.
Not to mention the frogs. Oh god the frogs!!
Kristi Nome
Krusty Gnome? :D
Indeed
Worse, the antifa riots rethoric is held against them. It looks like people start to wonder why these riots were allowed to start under the current administration.
And who spells it in all caps? What does each letter stand for, Evan? Is it an acronym, or a portmanteau of anti-fascism? Evan is losing me, to be honest 😒
I missed the ANTIFA riots.
Conspiracy theories paint fraudulent reality of Jan. 6 riot
Several different conspiracy theories have emerged in the year since the insurrection, according to an analysis of online content by media intelligence firm Zignal Labs on behalf of The Associated Press. Unfounded claims that the rioters were members of antifa went viral first, only to be overtaken by a baseless claim blaming FBI operatives.
Pretty sure they were referring to the protests in LA, Portland, etc. which conservative propaganda has successfully painted as “riots.”
Jan 6 was almost 6 years ago, and these people are talking about the current regime.
Propublica just had an article where they dived into just fox news’ coverage of portland and apparently they spice up their footage with pictures of the 2020 riots every time they mention portland.
To the point where it may be possible the city of portland could probably sue fox for defamation.
At least they got the border…
Yeah the border a thousand miles inland and away from the actual border.
Like 2k us citizens arrested unlawfully.
Can someone link me to the ANTIFA-riots? (I don’t trust Evans words for it, I’m just not a “trust me, bro”-kind of guy…)
There are none. Right wing propaganda media made the baseless claims that the No Kings protests were antifa riots.
I think he’s kidding.
I hope.
God fuck this timeline, I can’t tell either now.
(I totally am. Of course “Evan” is just an idiot. Or russian.)
No, hes not kidding.
Let me find that article on the Dunning-Kruger Times…
What are you for one moment insinuating that a conservative on Facebook might have less than reputable sources for their information?
I mean, he could be a russian bot or an absolute braindead idiot, who knows?
Not really trying to hide the racism anymore, are they?
I mean I’ve been paying attention to politics for the last 20-25 years now and I’ve known all along the Republican party had a racism problem, but the current boldness of it, almost flaunting of it, is still catching me by surprise.
Like that Kanye character openly selling swastikas on his site just after dumpy got in power
I could have never imagined seeing the world’s wealthiest man fire off two seig heils on stage at a Presidential Inauguration (with literally nothing coming of it), back during GWB’s administration.
Faux news absolutely lost their fucking minds when Obama tossed a salute at a jarhead while gasp holding a coffee. Wave a sign of respect to one of your guards while being black…they scream for weeks.
Actively salute a North Korean officer while being orange or seig heil while white and rich…totally patriotic and cool what’s he gonna do tomorrow.
This shit is making me lose sanity
Nope.
The goalposts have moved completely off the field at this point. It’s clear that conservatives cannot be trusted and should never, under any circumstances, be allowed to aggregate power.
I can only hope it’s all so extreme that in the long run it helps bury this traitorous party and confine them to the shitpile of history.
I feel like we figured this out in 1945, and the 1911 .45 still works very well.
How do I get in on these Antifa riots?
You have to apply, like all paid jobs. They only accept minorities, not white ones. They bring face paint and other props so acting like you’ve been tear gassed looks realistic. You have know the director to get a brick to throw during the police encounter. All of this is /s FYI
/s for secret, of course.
That is all that is needed for MAGA to vote.
Linda: “I was told that I’d get to be openly racist and rich! What the hell!”
Exactly. They’ll give Maxwell a puppy in prison but mothers bleading out in ICE detention from miscarriages, then say racism doesn’t exist.
You misunderstand. They don’t think racism doesnt exist. They simply approve of racism. You’re trying to think about this from a point of view where things have to make sense.
Its those mothers’ fault for not having leverage on the regime.
Room temp IQs, both of them.
In winter with the door open?
How’d you know?
I hope both of these people die in a fire.
Um that’s a wee bit much IMO, but how refreshing that we’re allowed to speak so boldly here without getting banned, unlike cough reddit cough where everyone gets banned for breathing.
If the illegal immigrants are being handled to their satisfaction and those other problems persist then I guess the illegals weren’t the problem, were they?
