Reagan-appointed federal judge Mark Wolf has resigned from the bench in Massachusetts, and his explanation is blunt: he can no longer bear the ethical constraints that prevent judges from speaking out publicly while Trump dismantles the rule of law.

  • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    …instead of, you know, staying on and using your bench to defend the constitution from Trump. Nice backbone you got there.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      if you actually read the article he’s becoming an activist against Trump. Something he is not allowed to do while holding the position

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          boy just pasting this on all the arm chair no it alls who can’t be bothered to read the article:

          When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.
          

          More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

          I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
          
        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          That’s doomerism friend. He has the power to use his knowledge of the legal system and his status as a famous judge

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            it’s not doomerism, it’s the truth.

            who do those things influence?

            not the legal system, because now he has to work within the legal system and not on-top-of the legal system.

            as far as being a “famous judge” does that mean Judge Judy has more power than him since she’s more famous?

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        The point being made here is why the fuck is everyone who is in a position to do fucking anything to stop the fascists following the rules so punctiliously, when the fascists demonstrably do not give a flying fuck about the rules?

        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          Bc that’s the point. If you stoop to their level then you are no better than them. The law means something to this man. He will fight how he chooses to to maintain that law

          • Chulk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            If you stoop to their level than you are no better than them

            Trump and his ilk are undermining the law to cleanse the US of those they deem undesirable. This guy could undermine the law to save those people.

            There’s a bit of a difference between those two types of people.

            Additionally, If the law is so easily discarded by those in power, then maybe the law isn’t worth defending at all. His activism would have been more effective as a sitting judge. To me he seems like a conservative judge who wishes conservatism still had a mask to hide behind.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          because what he is doing is more effective:

          When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.
          

          More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

          I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
          
      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        Trump and his goons have no problem doing things they’re not allowed to do. Accepting foreign gifts, stealing the power of the purse, trampling over the bill of rights, kidnapping and selling citizens to foreign prisons like cattle. We can’t beat those dickheads if we play by the rules. If whiny fascists say “you can’t do that” the answer should always be “come and stop me.”

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          no the article specifically shows it would not:

          When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.
          

          More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

          I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
          
        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          While I believe everyone should do what they feel is best, I have to agree with you