• big_slap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    0.4 milligrams per container limit? I have to read the rest of the article, but come on.

    why not also take this logic into account for alcoholic beverages?

    I know why, but the hypocrisy is insane. oh well, what are ya gonna do

    • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I agree. We need public executions. Either serve the people or don’t serve at all. You serve yourself while in office and we live stream your head falling off

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    The ONLY silver lining is that maybe some states will allow it, like CO and CA on actual weed. And that will encourage them to just make the real stuff legal too.

    It’s been 7 years and the world wasn’t destroyed by weed addicts.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        They wouldn’t, this change doesn’t really effect them. I meant states could over rule the fed and keep it legal like CA or CO does with weed currently. And then since they took a stand with the shitty alternatives they might as well do it with weed too.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      30 days ago

      Since the legalization in Germany in April, there has been nothing. No spiking crime rates, no spiking usage numbers, but still conservatives lose their shit Bavarian conservatives especially. You know, those conservatives who drink for tradition, not for fun.

  • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be clear, this proposition would ban hemp-derived THC. Gas stations and head shops shouldn’t be selling unregulated products like that anyway. Most of them are probably unfit for consumption.

    That said, as the article points out, this provision would have consequences beyond Delta-8 vape carts and the like. I think the correct approach is federal legalization.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      So the cannabis products sold in licensed dispensaries in NJ, for example, would be safe from this legislation?

      • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        That’s correct. This proposition closes the loophole used to sell hemp-derived THC products, but it does not impact anything statutorily defined as “marijuana”. That’s still federally illegal but permitted on a per-state basis