haley.io
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 days ago

EU backs away from chat control

www.heise.de

external-link
message-square
7
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • europe@sopuli.xyz
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
79
external-link

EU backs away from chat control

www.heise.de

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 days ago
message-square
7
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • europe@sopuli.xyz
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
In its new draft for combating child abuse online, the EU is abandoning chat control. Instead: risk assessments and voluntary measures.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    *For now

    This isn’t the first time and won’t be the last time they try this.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Even if it were true, they are pushing for age restrictions on social media which would probably have very similar effects

  • PortNull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m so confused right now

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m pretty sure this is that same proposal being pushed through earlier this week, and the author of the article is behind

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    For now

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    yeah ok forgive me if I don’t fucking believe that for a second

    • Scirocco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yea it’s bullshit. They want to build the whole thing as 'voluntary" which will last only until it’s in place and then some manufactured satanic-panik will make it “mandatory”

      This is a ploy to build the system now and flip the switch later.

Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don’t be a smartass and try to game the system, we’ll know if you’re breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don’t promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. “They already have my data, why bother?”)
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

  • !opensource@programming.dev
  • !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
  • !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 65 users / day
  • 371 users / week
  • 1.13K users / month
  • 6.31K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 4.26K subscribers
  • 774 Posts
  • 6.72K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Otter@lemmy.ca
  • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org