• t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 天前

    Yeah I really don’t like this. Seems lik a terrible way to do this.

    I’ve disabled updates on it.

    I already no longer use it to sync my music (moved to Navidrome with Symfonium). Do I move away for my personal photos & documents?

  • Telex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 天前

    Does some place have a trusted archived copy? Should be easy to checksum a given common commit in their history and read forward.

    • CandleTiger@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 天前

      I really don’t see why there are so many people around saying “it’s probably fine”

      In my personal opinion shit like this is probably not fine at all.

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 天前

        I really don’t see why there are so many people around saying “it’s probably fine”

        Because there is currently no direct evidence of anything amiss. From the linked article:

        Technically, the changes made so far have been reviewed by some people and no obvious malicious modifications have been found; F-Droid also builds the app reproducibly and verifies whether the published code matches the binaries

        Granted, someone could be playing a long game here. Get control, wait for the controversy to die down while playing nice, then do then rug pull when no one is watching anymore. That’s possible. It’s also quite possible that the previous maintainer got tired of doing a hard and thankless job for no pay and wanted to shed the whole thing. They found someone to hand it off to, and the new maintainer is just shit at open communications. That happens and is also possible. Whether or not it makes you change your usage of the package is down to your risk appetite. But, jumping at every shadow gets old quick and at some point you have to accept some risk. So, unless and until there is more evidence to backup the claim of foul play; or, if you have a really low risk appetite, this is one of those things which falls under “keep an ear open, but it’s probably fine”.

        • CandleTiger@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 天前

          Because there is currently no direct evidence of anything amiss.

          You don’t need direct evidence of a problem. It’s the other way around — In order for the software to be trustable with private data you need steady, ongoing evidence that the authors are trustworthy.

          National spy agencies are out there, right now, and recently in the news, trying to suborn open source project maintainers. This is a known risk.

          • CandleTiger@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 天前

            Yes. It’s very very hard to read the source and know there’s no security bug in it. That’s 10x truer when the security bugs are potentially on purpose, and carefully hidden.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 天前

              i would run a diff on the previous version compared to the current one.