LibreWolf is one of the best browsers for people who don’t like generative AI.

Here is the statement posted on Mastodon:

As there seems to have been recent confusion about this, just a quick “official” toot to then pin: we haven’t and won’t support “generative AI” related stuff in LibreWolf. If you see some features like that (like Perplexity search recently, or the link preview feature now) it is solely because it “slipped through”. As soon as we become aware of something like this / it gets reported to us, we will remove/disable it ASAP.

  • balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hope they keep the offline translation. It’s actually an OK use of LLMs with two caveats: I’m not sure how ethically they have been trained, and I don’t trust the output for anything vaguely important.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 days ago

    I switched to LibreWolf about six months ago -ish. I’m very happy with the browser. Happy to hear they won’t be incorporating the AI BS.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Same - around when all the terms and conditions drama was happening with Firefox.

      For me that was the breaking point. I want to use software I can trust to be on my side - software that I can update to the latest version without worrying about what awful anti-feature they might have slipped in, which I then have to go try and disable.

      Firefox demonstrated they aren’t that, but Librewolf gives you it. A clean browser with privacy-respecting defaults, no ads, no sponsored content, no studies, and uBlock installed out the box.

      Very happy.

  • paequ2@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    I switched to LibreWolf from Waterfox. Happy with my decision! Even more happy with this announcement!

    It’s a little unfortunate MacOS support isn’t the best. However, I totally agree with their stance of not paying the Apple tax. I run Linux, but I can’t totally recommend LibreWolf to my non-techie family cuz they’re on MacOS…

    On the other hand, LibreWolf was one of the reasons I moved my parents to Fedora Silverblue!

    • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah it’s getting to the point where there’s really just no point trying to protect your privacy any further on Mac or Windows. There’s simply no point bothering with a privacy-respecting browser when the OS itself is increasingly spying on you. Either choose a free OS or live with the consequences, unfortunately. Those who aren’t ready to make the switch are going to have to start becoming ready, or resign themselves to their fate until they are.

      • Albbi@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        I just switched to Waterfox today. I’m also curious about what the differences are.

        • Jean-luc Peak-hard@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          In short: LibreWolf is for those who want a “locked-down” fortress out of the box, while Waterfox is for those who want a privacy-conscious browser that still feels like a normal, convenient daily driver.

          Choose LibreWolf if: You want the highest level of privacy without having to manually edit config files, and you don’t mind occasionally “fixing” a broken website or re-logging into accounts.

          Choose Waterfox if: You want a privacy-respecting browser that supports Firefox Sync, has an Android counterpart, and handles streaming sites/logins without any extra friction (it supports WideWine out of the box, which lets you stream DRM protected content (netflix, hulu, disney, etc).

        • hash@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Currently using waterfox on android. Would appreciate hearing how tradeoffs compare to desktop.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I prefer IronFox on android as they include similar privacy protections out the gate similar to Librewolf, unlike Waterfox, which effectively stock firefox minus three or so components.

  • kizzard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I would use it if I could have bitwarden. Anyone know if Firefox extensions can be ported into librewolf?

    • Cody Iwatzky@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      LibreWolf is based on Firefox, so all of Firefox add-ons work properly. Also, Bitwarden is even recommended by the developers.

      Password managers
      We suggest that you use a more robust solution than the built-in password manager available in the browser:

      • Bitwarden: open source password manager that allows for synchronization across multiple devices.
      • KeePassXC-Browser: official browser plugin for the open source password manager KeePassXC.

      Recommended Addons – LibreWolf
      https://librewolf.net/docs/addons/#password-managers

      • kizzard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m feeling dumb, I got confused with Falkon which I was using for a hot second a few weeks ago. Great to know Librewolf supports extensions. Thanks for the clarification!

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      All Firefox extensions work with Librewolf, Bitwarden included. It’s still regular Firefox under the hood, just with different settings enabled by default, uBlock Origin out of the box, and some annoyances removed.

      • kizzard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m feeling dumb, I got confused with Falkon which I was using for a hot second a few weeks ago. Great to know Librewolf supports extensions. Thanks for the clarification!

  • eli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just downloaded it today and it’s been pretty solid. Need to keep using it to see if anything pops up but I think I’m making the switch.

    Been on Firefox for probably more than a decade now. And I have zero need for a Chromium browser.

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    People do get that ultimately Firefox is paying rent right? Like if firefox goes too far, the much smaller team behind Librewolf is very unlikely to be able to keep up.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Point is, there are still actual workers behind your favourite apps who still have to pay bills and feed their family. We can’t keep asking for cake and eat it. I don’t agree with the gradual enshitiffication, but I understand. This is why I am in favour of public-funded internet and applications, in the same vein how other countries fund their TV services like BBC or France 24.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            You could not use Firefox and move to a different alternative, but even devs in that alternative will start to demand to be paid more.

            • onlinepersona@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              7 days ago

              Nowhere is anybody complaining about Firefox devs wanting money. That is so far from the issue. Most of us would happily and willingly give Mozilla money if it went to making Firefox a thing we want. If Mozilla had a bounty on features, direct avenues to fund devs, asked for donations every quarter or every semester, called for hardware donations, asked the community how to improve and listened or had community members on the board, I doubt the majority would complain. Mozilla does none of that except maybe asking for donations.

              Donations to Mozilla just go into a black box and then you find out its gone to community outreach, AI features, buying an ad company, paying the ex CEO 5 millions per year, firing Servo engineers, and a bunch more crap.

              There are many reasons people don’t donate to Mozilla. Unwillingness to pay devs is not one of them.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        My point being that people are misinformed about how much of the important work is being done by who.

        The bills have to be paid.

        The underlying development exists because the developers at mozilla can put food on the table.

        We can’t ignore the fact that a project of Firefoxs scale cannot be held together by volunteer work and hopes and prayers.

        If people cared as much as they said they did, they should be looking at how the public could buy Mozilla such that the enshitification stopped rather than pretending alternatives would be able to survive the wake of any of the giants they are downstream of sinking.

        Web browsers really should have been publicly funded but we have what we have…