The ai image on the article is pretty ironic
I wonder what the woman is looking at to the left of the monitor.
Btw:
Written for you by our author Paul Arnold, edited by Gaby Clark, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You’ll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.
They should apply the same principles for their images. Hire artists, photographers, designers… They rely on income too
True. Either that, or, if too expensive, just don’t include an image. I really, really don’t need an image for every article. Especially if it’s slop that doesn’t bring anything interesting to the table.
There are even free stock image compilations with permissive licenses, it just takes some time to look up
Yeah that would be good, too. 👍


