• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No it’s not lol they still flicker out eyes just dont pick it up

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Incandescent bulbs like that in the picture don’t really flicker. They might pulsate a little bit but even at their faintest they would still have significant light output.

      Some LED bulbs do flicker though, it depends on how they implement the AC to DC conversion. If they flicker, it is easily noticeable to the human eye, especially when looking at motion.

    • hope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It has a 60Hz electric waveform in, and it produces visible light, which is in part a ~500THz wave.

      • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Do you think we will ever change our power grid to have a higher frequency so that our bulbs don’t flicker when we record things?

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          High frequency is generally bad for transmission line losses, so getting power from A to B is better at lower frequency — DC is a great option here.

          If we switched to DC, many things would still flicker though as they would presumably use switching power supplies, but those could be relatively high frequency like you said.

          Interestingly, airplanes use 400Hz, as transmission over distance doesn’t matter, and transformers can be made much smaller/lighter.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Also if we switched to DC, you’d need costly dcdc transformers to step up the voltage for transmission and back down again for domestic usage

              • adb@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 minutes ago

                They’re more efficient than old school ac-dc linear supplies (of which an ac transformer is just a part of). However if you just want to step up or down ac voltage, transformers are quite efficient.

          • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            But we could just attach an antenna to our roofs and steal electricity, I consider it worth the transmission loss if we can create more transmission loss.