• qupada@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      35% is the kind of numbers I used to have on servers at work, which often feature >2TB of RAM.

      (another similar percentage being the CPUs, 128 cores per socket doesn’t come cheap)

      Seeing those numbers for desktop hardware, “holy fuck” is about right.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        For data center shit, it’s probably up in the 70-80% range (unless you’re also running shitloads of H100s or A100s or whatever top of the line is these days)

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    PC manufacturers should grow some balls and tell RAM suppliers to lower the price or lose their business forever.

    • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      The RAM suppliers would probably be thrilled to end those consumer contracts, they could allocate more to high paying AI.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s no guarantee that AI companies will need this amount of product indefinitely, while PC manufactures will always need RAM. Alienating them would be commercially foolish.

        • droans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s exactly why they can alienate them. The PC manufacturers don’t really have many vendors to choose from.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            For now. Would you risk a long-standing relationship with your most important customers for a temporary boost in income?

            • droans@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Wouldn’t be the first time. They got caught in a huge price-fixing scandal just about a decade back and nothing changed.

              And again, where are the customers going to go? There’s only so much capacity and no one’s building new plants.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          Foolish in the long term, but quite effective in the short term.

          I don’t disagree, but it seems their priorities are not on long term stability.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            They do this because everyone else allows them to. I think computer and device manufacturers have more leverage than RAM manufacturers if they join together. Yet they don’t, because today’s management class is vastly incompetent.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    My base starting point parts list (full build with 9800x3d, 64GB/4TB, 9700xt) was 2000usd about five months ago when it was last used to base a build on.

    It’s currently ‘down’ to about 3400 after peaking last week at over 3500. The excess is nearly entirely from RAM and SSD prices.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fortunately you can save money by not buying HP PCs.

    If run prices get out of hand don’t buy more RAM don’t upgrade your computer don’t give them your money and then when the bubble pops continue not to give them your money. All these manufacturers need to fail