• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Yes. You’ll understand when you’re touched by his noodly appendage. Ramen!”

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s the natural outcome of parenting and mortality. We NEED something at the top managing all this so we can feel comfortable that someone is at the wheel.

  • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ironically, an individual who uses language to identify with and articulate a particular sub-category of human belief systems (i.e. atheism), is attempting to impose order in an indescribable universe.

      • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any description of existence would:

        • be based on a limited perspective and at best incomplete,
        • be in the form of language which is only a representation of the real thing,
        • only describe the mechanics of existence and would not answer the essential ‘why’.

        Existence is indescribable. The best description of life would be a non-verbal and direct felt experience, not words. Language providedes structured communication between perceptions, in other words: control and order.

        • Halasham@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why are we assuming there is a why to the universe? Most of us don’t look at natural phenomena and truly wonder why. We may use that word erroneously but what is being wondered is “how”.

  • p3n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Religion aside, if the universe is fundamentally unpredictable, then science is impossible.