Edit:

The poll stopped me in my tracks but it’s actually even worse.

It should not take this long to get to imdb

Edit2: didn’t even realize it thinks I’ll “love it” based on things I look up. I don’t think I’d like it.

Edit³: IMDb was the example I used without thinking. I’m aware that there’s a link to it in the top card. It’s the other web results that I don’t already know about that I’d like to see. I now know there’s a hidden “web” tab. There’s also https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example` but it’s still mildly infuriating that you have to know about these things to get the basic results we expected for years.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn. I switched to DDG like well over a year ago and thought I was just kind of putting up with it for the sake of privacy. Turns out I didn’t know how good I have it

    • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly. I’ve been using DDG for years now and when I have to use Google search for whatever reason, I am quickly reminded how crap ggl is.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      DDG is moving into the same direction. I had to use ublock to hide the news block that appears when I’m searching for a movie/show in order to avoid spoilers.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        In fact this was one of the key features lauded about DDG in its early days, the “instant result”-boxes.

        Google kinda only went hard on them afterwards, probably seeing a good idea over at DDG because for the vast majority of people, they’re looking for answers and results, not specifically objects of type link-to-search-result. They don’t need a list of links, so long as the information they were after is reliably in those generated cards.

        See OP wanting an IMDB link, which is directly there as Google correctly assumed that’s a very very very common use case for googling the name of a movie.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just switched to my own SearXNG instance. Won’t go back. Even did a PR for better Google Answers integration.

  • NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tbf there’s a link to imdb on the first image

    Yeah I usually like the Google boxes in search results, but this is so excessive. Everything after and including the polls is just completely unnecessary

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If anyone still wants to use google without this, you can use this url, replacing ‘%s’ with your search

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be fair. All the information for the movie is right there at the top. If you wanted just info about the movie.

    The poll though… Ya… That’s kinda crazy.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re throwing shit at the wall I guess. Last week I got this in my YouTube feed:

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Great, now they’re going to start giving us exams before we’re allowed to watch a video.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know this won’t be the answer people want, but to be perfectly frank if I know I want the IMDb page for a movie, I put IMDb in the query. It will put the page you want right at the top, none of that extra shit, and it will even probably predict what you’re typing before you finish.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But this genuinely feels sensible?

    The generated abstract includes the commonly needed links - including the IMDB you want and Rotten Tomatoes that I frequently want - and the very first result after that is Wikipedia for when you need that.

    It’s like the best abstraction so you don’t have to wade through results, correctly understanding that if you search by just the title, you probably want information of through-links to common information/review sites.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They took it too far. A few cards can be convenient (though I feel bad for site runners) but the poll?

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Your daily reminder that DDG also has an infinite scroll option under its settings. (Seriously, DDG’s Settings menu is so good.}

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a side point: IMDB’s page is even more obtuse and unnavigable than it was 5 years ago. Literally no hotbar…

      Every front end design dev that graduated in the last decade is brain damaged

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s Amazon’s way of working. They push the content that they want you to use over what you want to use.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This seems so fuckdamn back asswards to me. I mean the website experience is 80% of the service. Why alienate visitors for the CHANCE to upsell them when failure means they stop using the service?

          I mean let’s consider the opposite: What if every time you opened the page, stuff you WANTED was there instead of stuff THEY want you to want? I guarantee that would drive sales and satisfaction better than the impulse buy chinese shit that breaks in 3 uses.