• arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    SAP works like it was built in the 90s. It’s slow as fuck, doesn’t have good export capability, the worst user interface I’ve ever worked with, and is the least flexible ERP system I’ve ever encountered.

    I’d rather work with a custom built ERP in Oracle SQL circa 2000 than I would with SAP - at least then, I could get a clean table export in less than 3 hours. I mean, Nav is shit, but SAP is diarrhea locked behind a paywall.

    Sorry, I know there’s a big push towards non-US systems right now (which I support), but SAP is not a solution - it’s just another way to make your employees hate their job.

    • Blaze@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thank you for your feedback. I’ve seen Odoo mentioned in another comment, do you have any experience with it?

      • arotrios@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t with Odoo - looks promising, though.

        I do have a lot of experience with open source CMS and e-commerce software - what I would recommend if you go this path is to ensure you have an in-house developer to make up for a lower level of support you’ll have access to. The challenge with using open source as part of a business system is that it almost always involves more hands-on maintenance, and often doesn’t have long-term support available.

        For instance, Drupal can likely do most of what you’re looking at SAP to do, but it’s not an easy system to build with, and would likely rely on other modules (like Magento) to get you to where you really need to go - and each module / plugin you add decreases stability. Joomla is easier to work with, but less stable and requires even more plugin maintenance.

        Ultimately, I’d say your decision really depends on scale. If you’re a company with less than 100 employees, open source is usually a good bet if you’ve got a good in-house dev who can scale up the system as your company grows. If your company is larger with established revenue and business processes, then it’s usually wiser to look at a commercial solution.

        The other thing to consider is what you actually want to do with your ERP. If you’re looking primarily at content management and e-commerce, open source will likely have the stronger software packages. If you’re looking at a traditional business model, where you’re looking for extensive inventory management from multiple locations, then I’d probably recommend a closed source solution - Dynamics Nav over SAP (despite Nav’s headaches, it is a better system). Open source does great on the web, but since most open-source devs got their start in e-commerce, it tends to lag in supporting traditional business models.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      SAP works like it was built in the 90s.

      That’s because most of its core is.

      It’s slow as fuck

      Highly depends on what you’re doing and how much data you’re processing but in general this is incorrect. SAP uses in-memory computing for quite some time and looking at the vast amounts of data that is often processed, it’s pretty impressive from my perspective if you keep in mind that everything must be traceable and consistent at every point in time. I worked with SAP a lot and also with many newer competitors and can guarantee you, that the more recently developed solutions, aren’t any better.

      doesn’t have good export capability

      You have Excel/CSV exports almost everywhere and where you don’t have it, you can still always access all the data you need from the database tables via SQL, data extractors etc. Maybe not perfect but Oracle, Navision, Workday etc. aren’t better IMO.

      the worst user interface I’ve ever worked with

      The old ‘dynpro’ UIs are pretty ugly compared to today’s standard. SAP is aware of that and offers a new UI technology (‘Fiori’) for more than a decade. It’s still not perfect but they’re working on it.

      is the least flexible ERP system I’ve ever encountered

      Excuse me the harsh wording, but this is complete bullshit. SAP ERP is literally open source software (not FOSS!). Even if you are in the rare situation that your requirement cannot be fulfilled with one of the official enhancement mechanisms (Business Add-In, user exit, BRF+, enhancement points, database appends, etc.) you can literally just look at all the source code and adapt it to your needs. How much more flexibility can you have?

      I’d rather work with a custom built ERP

      If you are in a rather small company, I can get that sentiment. But in big corporations, building and maintaining everything yourself is just not an option in a world where legal and market requirements are constantly changing.

      I can understand when people don’t love SAP. It’s not perfect by any means. But I also don’t understand why it’s sometimes hated like here. I’ve been in several evaluations for ERP systems where it won against plenty of competitors. It definitely is a pretty flexible and powerful solution for big companies.

      • arotrios@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        But I also don’t understand why it’s sometimes hated like here. I’ve been in several evaluations for ERP systems where it won against plenty of competitors.

        It really comes down to ease of use. For instance, I can get excel exports off of the financial reports I run from SAP. But the report takes an hour to run, and only specific subsections are exportable. The amount of data its parsing is maybe about 100k rows.

        In comparison, I have worked with a custom Oracle ERP built circa 2005 - this is what I was directly comparing SAP to. It had easily 10x the amount of data as the SAP system I work with now, and was not only managing inventory for 100+ stores across multiple countries, but was dynamically pricing and shipping them from the drop-shipper with the best price. Longest time for a report parsing 1mil rows was 10 minutes (via Quicksight - and that was dynamic draw, cached was drastically quicker).

        Even the oldest system I worked with, a COBOL based system called AMS, could pull reports quicker than the SAP I’m forced to use now.

        In comparison to Nav - any report is laid out fully exportable in under five minutes, usually less. If I have proper access in Nav, I can go straight to the core tables within the interface itself. There’s drag and drop capability. ODBC connections are a breeze - every version of SAP I’ve worked with has had them locked down (this may be an admin issue rather than architecture, I admit here).

        That being said, each install of SAP is its own beast - I’ve heard the system is extremely customizable, and it’s likely my current workplace is on an older version (because holy fuck does the interface suck - who the fuck thought a clock icon was good choice to run a report?). And I’ve only used it as an analyst / end-user.

        But if I had the chance to never work with it again, I’d jump at it in a heartbeat.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s pretty bad, but it’s still so much better than AccountEdge. I hated using SAP, but AE is worse in every single way.

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t work for SAP, but I’ve dealt with the software both as a user and an administrator quite a few times. It’s horrible, but all the alternatives are even worse. ERP is not a particularly nice field of technology. Corporate loves it though.

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve never met and end user who likes SAP but because they are international leadership has decided to use it everywhere even when the fit is bad.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Isn’t SAP a predatory corporation locking in companies in their garden and lobbying universities to teach only SAP?

  • Occhioverde@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Odoo is the best alternative out there. It is developed by a Belgian company, but it is entirely Open Source and allows you to self-host it in order to completely own your data and avoid having to depend on a provider, even if European.

  • Franklollo@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hate it with every cell of my body. Either it was implemented poorly in the factory I work or it’s just stupid. In order to move one pallet from a place to another, I have to press 8 times the enter key. When I first move it I have to write the magic number 101 in the little box at the end of the page, then I can write the location, then I have to rewrite the location and then I have to press 2 times enter. The stupid thing is that when creating a pallet it asks for the ubication but you can’t change it

  • llama@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    My company doesn’t use SAP directly but we have several customers who do, and our accounting department complains every time they have to go into SAP Arriba and setup a new supplier account.

  • zpteixeira@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Having worked with it, I hate it. It’s the kind of software that appears to thrive on being difficult to learn. I’ve also used Primavera (portuguese) in the past (now called Cegid) and I found it better.