• Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I once had to leave a line filled with glycol overnight, for a hydro test the next morning. I wired the drain valve shut, then shaped the extra ‘wire’ (it was a welding rod) into the word ‘No’.

    Safety was mildly annoyed, but nobody touched it

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I used to put these on broken equipment, intensely fucking annoying job, had my boss cut one off, plug back in the unit, call me into his office to chew me out for DARING to lock out tag out a working unit, and then the fire alarm goes off. Guess what started the fire? I couldn’t quit fast enough.

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s always some jackass pulling this kind of thing. I’ve even heard of people cutting off locks for locking out things, including a shit like breaker boxes while a guy was working on wiring. Jackass coworker pulled that, blew the guy who locked it and tagged it right off of his ladder and into the hospital. The boss suggested to the idiot that cut it off that he could either resign immediately or wait until injured coworker came back from the hospital and rehabilitation and deal with him personally. Idiot stick quit.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          WHY DID HIS DUMB ASS NOT GET FIRED FOR ATTEMPTING TO ELECTROCUTE A COWORKER?!?!

          Seriously, I’m more mad at the company for their policy than the dumbass who tried to fry another employee. The employee is a moron who might hurt someone, the company is negligent and is likely to get multiple employees hurt or killed with that kind of lax policy.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        isnt the LOTO procedure to ask the person listed on the tag whats wrong with it before actually trying to use it. Boss ego crazy to completely just ignore the tag without understanding why it was on there in the first place.

        • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          At my place of work, we have a switch that has been locked out for over a decade. The dude doesn’t even work there anymore. Perhaps isn’t alive. It isn’t critical, but our LOTO trainings don’t cover that possibility.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s actually exactly how it should work. The switch isn’t necessary, or someone would have called in an expert to fix it, so it hasn’t been fixed and remains locked.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh yeah. If he wasn’t the guy with the hiring and firing job he would have been walked off that day. He’s easily the worst boss I ever had. Started planning my escape after that. The company had a real problem with sunk cost fallacy. ‘‘Well we invested so much in him’’ was the adittude.

    • Incandemon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That it damn well is. Those rules are written in blood. I’m sad to say I knew people that didn’t follow the rules at place that didn’t care. May they rest in peace.

  • fulcrummed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pretty sure that’s an Australian LOTO tag made by AAA printing. Which means it definitely says “cock”. Only thing that’s surprising about this on an Aussie mine site is that the word used doesn’t start with “cu…”

    For additional evidence look at previous L and Cs written on the tag. Def Cs.

    My guess is that someone either went to repair it and couldn’t find the issue so this additional helpful tag was added. Or similarly maybe a muppet thought it was still ok to use and again, this helpful tag was added for reinforcement.

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      nah, my bet is that’s a machine that’s like visibly exploded to pieces. some manager walked by and reprimanded them for not tagging the broken gear. writer of tag argued back that “it’s obviously fucked, i mean look at it. have a think about it for a second”. manager said it doesn’t matter, protocol. tag writer writes sarcastic tag.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m imagining obvious fire damage and a chalk outline of intern Redshirt in front of the machine…

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          you know, i bet it’s literally missing its primary control surface. like a tractor with the entire cab missing and some higher up was concerned someone would try to use it and hurt themselves.

          • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Genuinely wouldn’t be surprised if someone did try to use it, but also don’t see why anyone would think a little red tag would prevent such a person from trying anyway.

            • Revan343@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The red tag isn’t to stop it, it’s to document the stupidity. Now when it goes to court/WCB, there’s documented proof that they tried to ensure even a moron would understand it’s not safe to use

              • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                yeah, it’s likely for insurance or regulatory reasons.

                insurance will find any reason possible to deny your claim. even if that is a failure to remove the keys from the ignition after the car burst into flames.

                regulators shouldn’t allow slack. with any company in a regulatory situation they will to exactly as much as they’re allowed to get away with. give them an inch, they take a Mile. letting hazard tags slide based on judgement creates space for corruption and abuse. following procedures to the letter with strict documentation can help curtail that.