The grieving parents of a 7-year-old child who died hours after being hit by a car were charged with involuntary manslaughter after allowing him and his brother, 10, to walk home unaccompanied by an adult from a nearby grocery store.

  • Dammam No. 7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They got it backwards. I will hold the road planners, the city government, the driving license issuer, and the driver responsible. It start with poorly designed roads and ends with poor driver training. The parents are the victims here.

    • jnod4@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the parents fault for birthing a child into this hellscape into the first place. We’ve built this inherently violent landscape and your letting your spawns roam free? /s

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you watch the video in THIS report, it’s clear that planners should bare some responsibility here.

      They designed no logical, safe crossing where people need to cross. Even during the report, you can see other pedestrians walking across.

      The only “sidewalk” is a tiny strip on only one side, and it’s right against the curb. You might as well be walking in a shoulder!

      And the speed in an area like that is too damn fast.

      That road was designed to be anti-pedestrian. Not the parent’s fault.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    The us is so fucked. I’ve been letting my kid take the buss to the other side of town alone since she was 9. And traffic accidents are very rare despite most neighbourhoods not having sidewalks at all. Of course we drive a lot slower and it takes months of obligatory coursework to be eligible to take a driving test. https://www.vegvesen.no/en/driving-licences/driver-training/how-to-get-a-driving-licence/passenger-car--b/

  • Headofthebored @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    District Attorney Travis Page. Gaston County. Prosecutorial District 38. (704) 852-3113. Tell him your thoughts.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    there is no evidence of speeding or wrongdoing on the part of the driver, therefore no charges have been filed.

    He hit a pedestrian. If you cannot react to a pedestrian entering the road unexpectedly, especially at a crosswalk, you are, by definition, driving recklessly.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would mean every driver on the highway is driving recklessly.

      “yes! Now you see how carbrained society is”

      counterpoint: society is to blame, not individual drivers.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah, highways tend have lots of visibility around them, you can see a person a long ways off. Though, if you do see a kid on the side (and don’t intend to stop), you should absolutely be slowing down and giving them a wide berth!

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      The article says they attempted to cross between the crosswalks. A witness said the younger child jumped into the street. There’s only so much reaction even the most alert driver can do.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I’m driving in an area where pedestrians can be present and my view of a walkway is obstructed, I slow down. A speed limit isn’t an obligation nor is it a right to travel at speeds that have the potential to be unsafe. I treat every blind spot as if there’s something behind it ready to jump out at a moment’s notice and I adjust my speed to anticipate it. I do that because I believe operating within legally defined parameters doesn’t exempt me from the responsibility of my actions causing harm to another person.

        We as a society are far too lenient toward drivers who take for granted the fact that they’re in control of high-velocity heavy-machinery that can and do kill people on a daily basis. Traffic deaths aren’t an inevitability, in most cases they’re caused by overconfidence.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        It doesn’t matter where I’m from, you are supposed to be able to stop

      • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yep. U got this right. People here are just dumb. Kid jumps in from of the car that is going 45mph. Parents should be holding hand and not letting kids just do what the kids want to do.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Fair point, it was indeed between crosswalks. But from the sound of it, the kids had been waiting to cross, and the younger kid jumped out on his own.

        The older kid saw the danger, meaning the car should have been able to see at least one kid too. I maintain that if you can’t react safely to kids you can see jumping unexpectedly off the curb as you drive by, you have no business driving.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Without seeing the incident, it’s hard to say whether the driver should have reasonably been able to stop in time. Given what we know, it’s entirely possible that he could not.

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            The only way I can see the driver not being at fault is if he 1) could not see the kids near the road, and 2) had no reason to expect people might be in blind spots near the road.

            Given that there were houses less than 2 blocks from the site of the incident, 2 seems unlikely - this sounds like either a suburban or urban neighborhood (multiple crosswalks within 2 blocks for a 4 lane road). No mention was made of any obstructions, which is not evidence in itself; but it’s the rare four lane road that hasn’t had obstructions cleared from the sides of the road (partly for this reason!), particularly in a non-rural area. At a glance, Gastonia seems to generally keep their roads clear.

            I can certainly be convinced otherwise with more evidence, but the burden of vehicle safety absolutely lies on the driver. If you can’t respond fast enough to a seven year old running out in front of you from a place you can’t see; you are, by definition, driving too fast - regardless of the posted speed limit. And if you can see them, and aren’t driving in such a way as to be able to keep them safe should they run in front of you, you’re driving recklessly.

          • fodor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Except not really. It’s a small town and from the article it sounds like the driver is an old person who has lived there for many years. They know what time kids are around, they know where kids usually hang out, and if they have half a brain they’ll drive 15 mph in those areas.

            My regular commute takes me near an elementary school, and every morning when I see those kids I drop my speed very low because you never know what they’re going to do. It’s your basic moral responsibility to keep the speed down because you know that small children don’t have the experience and common sense to keep themselves out of the street.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    City makes walking on foot a death sentence, offloads responsibility on people foolish enough to produce life in a world that wants us to die.

  • Retrograde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I bet it’s in a Republican shithole city in a Republican shithole state?

    I don’t even have to check

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    6 months ago

    This doesn’t serve justice, in any way.

    Why were the children trying to walk between crosswalks? I’d bet because the only crosswalks anywhere in the area are at stoplights and way too far apart. A painted cross wall at minimum, or a HAWK light that stops vehicle traffic should have been there. But those are too expensive until multiple people are killed by traffic, it takes a lot of blood to get human-cebtric infrastructure installed in this country.

    The crosswalk directly leading to the middle school near me was known by the school and the neighborhood to be dangerous due to traffic speed, and the community had been fighting for a HAWK light to be installed by the county for nearly a decade. They even widened and replaced the road during that time and still refused to install it (although they did install the underground conduit necessary when doing the roadwork). It took 4 children total being killed by vehicles outside of school hours before they finally agreed to install a HAWK light there.

    Charging the parents doesn’t do any public good. I doubt they’re going to find a full jury that could convict unless there’s some underlying information about the parents trying to kill the kids or some shit like that. I can’t imagine a jury of 12 would unanimously convict.l based on the info provided.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anything to shift accountability away from drivers, huh? Cars and the people behind the wheel of them are just an unavoidable force of nature now?

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      76yo probably shouldnt be driving, wanna bet the driver could be well connected, alot of these wierd incidents magically disappears.

  • Nanook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can we start labeling if something is US. Cause this feels very US. Have you guys tried sidewalks?

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m SO mad at this story. There is no reason to charge the parents. As others have stated, helicoptering kiddos is detrimental, and they need to be allowed to roam their environment – That can come at the cost of danger, but we cannot be expected to grow with 0 risk.

    Sure, as a parent, you can state: ‘don’t go there’, and ‘always look both ways’, but kids are kids and there’s only so much you can enforce without being overbearing. In this scenario, without video evidence, there’s no clear conclusion about fault for either the driver or the child.

    I’m okay with letting the driver off (criminally, let insurance pay the family but don’t put the driver in jail) and acknowledging this as an accidental death, especially since he stuck around and is complying. Charging the parents for negligence, though, is just fucking brutal when they are suffering the loss of a child, not to mention the impact on the older son, who probably is feeling an unreasonable amount unreasonable of guilt: “I could have held his hand; I could have reminded him of the road…” (not his quotes, my presumed internal dialog). Again, as others have stated, this is a city planning problem, not a parental one: If there was a way to walk to a grocery store that didn’t cross a 4-lane road, that’d be a better option, but there are plenty of places where that is not possible.

    These parents do NOT need the extra burden of being held legally liable for an accident and anyone blaming them for this without knowing them personally and being able to describe other aspects of their parent as negligent is just an asshole.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    “In such cases, adults must be held accountable for their responsibilities to ensure a safe environment for their children,” police said in a statement.

    Okay, I get the rational behind it.

    Gastonia police declined to comment to NBC News, but said in a statement that “there is no evidence of speeding or wrongdoing on the part of the driver, therefore no charges have been filed. The driver continues to be cooperative and the incident remains under active investigation by the Gastonia Police Department’s Traffic Division.”

    Except when you drive a car, fuck it! You can do whatever you want. As a driver of a vehicle that can kill people, you don’t have be responsble for anything.

  • topherclay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    6 months ago

    They gotta blame the people who designed the city. If these kids were a small fraction of the same age and in Japan they would be on TV for braving their first solo trip into the market to buy a vegetable for dinner. It would be a cute TV show called “Old Enough” on Netflix with English subtitles instead of a cruel reality on this side of the same planet where a kid is now dead.

    That part of it isn’t the fault of the parents, but the fault of the society we have created.

    Btw that TV show is a few decades old but my point is that the world is possible. We don’t need to be like Japan was in that TV show, but we do need more walkable cities.

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      I came here to mention Old Enough. So sad that my American kid can never have this kind of experience because of how fucked our cities and society are.

    • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Imagine your kid dies, your other kid being traumatized by watching his brother die, and then being charged with involuntary manslaughter.

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Was the driver driving a child-killing American truck? If so, both the driver and car company should be charged with voluntary manslaughter.

    They knew this was going to happen, yet they still bought and produced the child-killing tank.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Look, americans are proud R strategists. Maybe you sluggish europeans dont know what that means, but we need ways to cull the weak before we waste too nany resources on useless eaters, so designated zones and tools, in/with which it’s considered okay to murder children are an absolute necessity. Doing it with our cars, integrqting it into our transit system, more than makes up for the loss of efficiency from not using trains and bikes. So how do YOU propose we murder children, then, huh?

      Do you think we should just stop killing children on purpose? Fucking yankeephobic eurotrash.