• CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        As a bad person, I will warn people about pirating softwares. There are really virus, malwares and many sophisticated malicious codes within those programmes.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I long for the era when fans who were asked if they would swallow future exclusivity deals would stare blankly and say, Wat?

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So has fire insurance on game company office buildings, but fans never cared about it or boycotted games over it, etc.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Ok let me Sheldon it for you: Yes, deals existed “back in the day” as the saying goes, but fans were not aware of (or reactive to) the business aspects of gaming enough for the deals to be the subject of headlines or controversy.

            • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I wasn’t disagreeing with you, just pointing out your example was a bit wild. I fully agree with your other point. Although I would also point out that the early exclusives were that simply because it just didn’t occur to devs to release a game on more than one console.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didn’t even touch this game when they were giving it away for free because of the privacy issues

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m just here to say my god, that article was horribly written!

    If this is what humans are cranking out, maybe I should reconsider my opinion of LLMs.

  • Goodeye8@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why are people taking this even remotely seriously? This is Pitchford doing marketing for BL4. BL3 already showed people don’t want Epic exclusivity and there’s no such thing as Steam exclusivity. They can choose to release exclusively on Steam but that’s just artificial exclusivity because nothing about Steam prevents them from releasing on Epic or GOG.

    It’s a pointless poll made by Pitchford either to keep BL4 in the media cycle or to just shit stir, possibly both.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Any chance he’s putting the question on social media to convince other stakeholders above him?

      It’s possible he was in a board meeting when some novice shareholder suggested “What if you take an exclusivity deal”? And he just didn’t have clear evidence on hand of that being vastly unpopular. Obviously that could be me being overgenerous to him.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There is a chance but what is he convincing them of? That they should take a non-existent exclusivity deal with Steam? They already have the data that exclusivity with Epic does not work and Steam doesn’t do exclusivity deals.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pitchford is a cunt when he wakes up, and when he goes to bed he reviews a checklist to make sure he still retains the appropriate level of cunt in his daily routine.

        He’s not doing anything unless it makes Randy Pitchford more rich, or alternatively, makes sure he’s still a cunting waste of life.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s what I mean by artificial exclusivity. There are games where the developer or publisher decided it’s the only platform they will release on but that kind of “exclusivity” is not at all the same as Epic paying developers or publishers to not release on Steam. Valve/Steam doesn’t prevent those games being released elsewhere, the developers/publishers themselves don’t want to.

        I could understand smaller (I’m talking literal solo devs or studios with less than 10 people) choosing to be exclusively on Steam. Supporting other platforms can have huge overhead costs for them. But for a studio the size of Gearbox there’s no benefit to being exclusively on Steam. They have enough support staff to manage multiple stores. There maybe be suits wondering if it’s worth being exclusively on Epic but there are no suits sitting around wondering whether to be exclusively on Steam or not, the answer is obviously not.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    5 months ago

    Customers already told them this by not buying on Epic and waiting 6 months to a year to buy on Steam.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Other than GOTY edition of the first game, this entire series has LAN (so far), which is commendable and stupidly rare! I hope the GOTY edition doesn’t show that they’re nixing this for BL4 as well.