haley.io
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months ago

Hope you like math

lemmy.today

message-square
62
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
985

Hope you like math

lemmy.today

MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months ago
message-square
62
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    fan-fucking-tastic

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    What the uncomputable fuck

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ahh the navier stokes fuck. Believed to actually be computable.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I prefer to solve the Hodge conjecture

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I see this comment section is full of various operations defined on fuckery. I don’t think they form a field or even a ringi

  • Redfox8@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you’d like to hear about the versatility of the word ‘fuck’ click and enjoy some Wildhearts at the same time :)

    https://youtu.be/3ZLFlzDazvA

    You may want to skip the last minute…on the original cd it was waaay longer!

  • Sunoc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Okay but is the fuck a monoid in the category of endofunctors ?

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The fuck transcends our ability to capture its essence

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    And relative fucks

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s mainly limited to the American South.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant (TAC for short).

    • 🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is the speed of fucks thus constant?

      • mrsemi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Removed by mod

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well that’s fucked…

    • UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I wouldn’t get water from that

  • Entitle9294@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I’ll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does “isomorphic with the complex field” mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I’ve done in category theory.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f© and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        “i do not give a single fuck” implies an additive identity fuck, and “I don’t give two fucks” implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That’s a start at least!

      • Atlas_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hmmm. But what if fucks aren’t fungible?

      • Entitle9294@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.

        I’ll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞

        • DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          ELI5: it means that for every number there’s a matching fuck and vice versa.

          • Eq0@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Not only for any number of fucks there is a corresponding complex number, but the basic operations (+, -, x, /) work in the same way for fucks and complex numbers

            Overall, if two things are isomorphic you can consider them «  the same »

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good luck!

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are definitely positive and negative fucks

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There being absolute fucks doesn’t imply positive and negative fucks though.

      It implies we’ve set a point to measure against which we call zero fucks.

      Perhaps there’s an absolute zero fucks which can never be reached.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Euler’s fuck formula.

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I fucking love this

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    So what’s fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      About tree fiddy

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 856 users / day
  • 4.63K users / week
  • 9.42K users / month
  • 19.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 17.7K subscribers
  • 5.43K Posts
  • 98.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org