• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 个月前

    I have a neighbor who claims to be a historian. specialized in civil war history. specifically the south.

    unsurprisingly they voted for an orange bastard.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    It’s easy to filter out the heeraboos by probing which B-word they use to describe German land doctrine.

    Bewegungskrieg (I may have spelled that incorrectly) was the actual doctrine, and yes, it was an innovative precursor to today’s land-air battle. Blitzkrieg was just a slang.

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      “I have never used the word Blitzkrieg, because it is a completely stupid word” - the little man with the weird moustache

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        I think the little mustache weirdo was among those who actually used it. In other words, probably without shocking anyone, Hitler was a Heeraboo

    • Azteh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 个月前

      Today I learned I’m a heeraboo. Is blitzkrieg really just slang for bewegungskrieg?

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    You know what the worst kind of thing is with WW2 stuff? Being into historical tanks and planes while still believing that war is pretty shitty and the Nazis didn’t lose hard enough.

    Yes, I think a tank is a cool engineering achievement. No, I don’t want to talk to you about how war crimes are actually neat. No, I don’t want to help you beat up minorities.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Or the V1 and the V2 what an engineering feat, especially the V2. But yeah, my skin crawls when I see the Nazis, they were just like evil children X 100.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 个月前

      Same. I do enjoy WW2 tanks, and yes, that includes German ones. And yes, I think the Tiger H1 is pretty neat.

      But so was PzIV F.
      And so was the Sherman.
      Fw190 was an excellent plane.
      So was the Hawker Hurricane.
      And the F4U.

      I’m in it for the tech, not the fascist stuff. It’s just that it’s easier to find info on the German hardware, as long as one is able to separate facts from propaganda.

      “It took 5 Shermans to take out a tiger”… …Yes. Took 5 shermans to take out anything else too. Because that was the usual operational unit.

      t34 was junk, tho.

      • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        “It took 5 Shermans to take out a tiger”… …Yes. Took 5 shermans to take out anything else too. Because that was the usual operational unit.

        This also demonstrates the huge manufacturing deficeit on the part of the axis

        • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 个月前

          Yeah, one aspect of the German military after the fall of France is how depleted they were both in manpower and hardware. Sure, they were still a powerful army, but nowhere near their full operational strength as defined in doctrine.

          If Germany were able to magically reinforce up to full strength, the outcome could have been very different (on land at least. Navy was severely lacking in most respects, even before 1939). Their manufacturing were only barely able to compete with UK and her allies at the beginning of the war, let alone USSR and the US once they entered the war.

          And manpower surges during the war came at the cost of industry. On a surface level it might seem like Germany was great at reducing unemployment and all that, but the truth is that it was an act of desperation - the war economy was bleeding Germany of any and all capable adult (and many who weren’t even adult), and this is obviously not something that can be sustained in the long run. And especially concerning for russia these days is what happens when you try to turn a war economy into a civilian economy - It’s going to be a disaster. War economy uncurs a massive debt, financially and otherwise, and one day that debt needs to be paid.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 个月前

            Yeah, the state of the kriegsmarine is the primary reason operation sealion was so laughably stupid. There was no possible way they were ever going to make it across the channel with the world’s most powerful and second most powerful navies defending it.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 个月前

        On the contrary, the T-34 was a feat of engineering, it was just forced by circumstances to optimize to different priorities. There’s a reason Guderian considered directly copying them - and why the Panther looks the way it does. Hell, there’s an argument to be made the whole T-series until Armata was just continuing the development of the T-34.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        Ah the proximity fuse! Another incredible feat IMO, a radar shot out of a cannon…

        • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 个月前

          Oh yes, crazy when you think about it. Nowadays you’d just put some semiconductors, pot it all in epoxy… but they neither had modern epoxy nor transistors.

      • Forester@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 个月前

        It’s more like Germany had a test run in Spain where they got to try out all of their new toys and strategies in a live environment. While everyone else was still planning for a new round of trench warfare.

        I think it’s funny that everyone thinks that Germany had the most advanced tech they didn’t. They did have the most advanced presses and they did have more refined metallurgical processes. But that’s because they didn’t have any good local sources of iron. Just a lot of magnesium and coal.

        Tldr being really good in a few Fields out of 30 odd Fields required for warfare does not make you the most technologically advanced. But it does make your industry make fewer tanks with thicker armor.