Is he harming anyone by dressing like that? No, he isn’t - so why shame him for it? Let people do their thing. It’s bullies like this that make everyone so worried about what others think, to the point they can’t freely be themselves.
If you wouldn’t shame a guy for wearing a dress, then you shouldn’t shame one for dressing like a mall ninja either.
I’m not judging him for the outfit, really, I’m judging him for the attitude. His outfit just so happens to directly telegraph his attitude. If I saw a person wearing a dress that said “I like to fuck kids” I would judge that person for that.
He’s clearly, at best, extremely paranoid and shouldn’t be given a weapon.
His vest doesn’t say “I want to shoot people” - I don’t think that’s a fair comparison. Having a badge with a swastika on it tells more about person’s ideological views than a full mall ninja outfit does.
Yeah no, this isn’t fucking laser tag, we’re talking about weapons of war designed to kill human beings. People like this need to be kept as far away from them as possible.
He can be mocked. He made tragic and anti-social fashion choices. Fashion absolutely can be criticized. Fashion is a way we COMMUNICATE and the things we SAY IN PUBLIC are fair ground for criticism.
This isn’t an expression of his sexuality, or his religion, or anything else that deserves a protected status. It’s not like he came in the only suit he owns and people are making fun of it for being shabby. This is an expression through intentional fashion choices of his politics and his worldview. It’s para-militaristic larping in public, in a professional setting, with people who don’t want to play with him. And we can say that it is fucking shit. I genuinely don’t understand your problem with that.
Look, there is a guy up thread body shaming and another guy denigrating people with ASD. Gowan, have fun. But get a grip.
If you wouldn’t shame a guy for wearing a dress, then you shouldn’t shame one for dressing like a mall ninja either.
A disingenous comparison. It is almost like these are two completely different things with different contexts. Of course we should shame this potential mass shooter for this.
This is the exact same logic people use to paint trans people as perverts or potential rapists - not because of anything they’ve done, but because of the stereotypes their appearance triggers in others. You’re just doing mental gymnastics to deal with the cognitive dissonance of holding two conflicting views at the same time.
You can tell things about people by the way they dress and the way they look in general. This guy’s decision to dress like that screams that he’s going to pull a gun when there is no need to. You know this, but you’re doing mental gymnastics trying to deny it because of trans people being persecuted by morons.
No, you can’t tell - you’re making assumptions. That’s exactly the same logic people use to justify shaming trans people, Muslims, or anyone else who “looks” like a stereotype they fear. Everyone convinces themselves their stereotype is the special exception. If you’re okay with that logic here, then you’ve basically conceded that appearance alone is fair grounds for public shaming across the board.
And the ratio of people dressing like this to actual mass shooters is so vanishingly small that your assumption is going to be wrong virtually every single time.
Yes these are assumptions and yes there’s always exceptions. For example, this could be a publicity stunt, maybe he was taking the piss.
But this case here is not the same as making generalizations about groups of people based on looks. It’s not the same as thinking that because someone is dark skinned and has a beard they’re a terrorist. There are different kinds of conclusions one can relatively safely reach based on outside appearance.
For example, if you see someone with cauliflower ears you can safely assume that they engage in some sort of wrestling, jiu jitsu martial arts sort of thing and conversely it might be a good idea not to initiate a physical confrontation.
My point is, drawing conclusions and forming a rough profile of someone based on looks is a natural process and one should not shut it down. Just keep an open mind at all times.
This particular guy in the picture is not profiled based on gender, nationality etc. It’s the context of the class subject and the very particular attire that make people jittery.
Not saying don’t give him the benefit of a doubt, but I do think you can pretty safely assume that he is probably not the most responsible person to give a lethal weapon to. That’s all.
I don’t necessarily disagree with that. You can make educated guesses about people based on appearance - it won’t always be right, but it’s not something to ignore either. At most, it’s grounds for suspicion, not for treating those assumptions as fact. To me it seems far more likely this guy is just socially awkward and thinks he looks cool or badass. I wouldn’t feel comfortable making fun of him for that - it just feels mean.
Yeah, well, I’m from a country where concealed carry permits don’t even exist. The only people with guns are basically the police, military and hunters. If someone showed up dressed like that to apply for a gun permit here, I’d personally see it as a huge red flag. But I have different standards for the US, where things are already quite different to begin with.
I enjoy a good sparring session too. It’s nothing personal - it’s just a shame so many people take it that way.
Looking at him, I’d say there’s a high likelihood he’s autistic. We’re generally not the best at judging what’s “appropriate” in a social setting. There’s nothing wrong with going up and telling him directly, but shaming isn’t helpful - especially when it’s done behind his back.
Why are you bending over backwards to defend this shit? It’s bizarre…
When people (usually disingenuously) harp on about “mental health funding” after some mass shooting event, this is the shit they’re supposedly talking about. These are the people we are supposed to be flagging before they get the go ahead to fucking conceal carry.
It’s not a joke, giving this guy guns could literally mean life or death for people. I think it’s OK to maybe be extra cautious when it comes to weapons designed to end human life. But that’s just me.
Why are you bending over backwards to defend this shit? It’s bizarre…
Because I’m willing to stand behind my principles even when the entire mob is against me. If there’s one thing I despise in this world, it’s bullies, and that’s what I’m calling you all out on. All you have seen is one picture and you’ve decided that he’s a future school shooter and a nazi. That is absolutely ridiculous leap to make. For all I know he could be a perfectly decent human being with severe case of lack of situational awareness and social norms. I’m however willing to grant him the benefit of the doubt and defend him from the blood thirsty mob even at my personal expense because I think it’s the right thing to do.
Sometimes it’s good to re-evaluate those beliefs in light of new arguments that maybe you hadn’t considered. Nobody is going to judge you here, it’s ok to change your mind.
There is no “autistic look” and people with autism often have sensitivity issues, meaning coarse clothes that bind at the joints aren’t likely to be chosen by them.
Is he harming anyone by dressing like that? No, he isn’t - so why shame him for it? Let people do their thing. It’s bullies like this that make everyone so worried about what others think, to the point they can’t freely be themselves.
If you wouldn’t shame a guy for wearing a dress, then you shouldn’t shame one for dressing like a mall ninja either.
I’m not judging him for the outfit, really, I’m judging him for the attitude. His outfit just so happens to directly telegraph his attitude. If I saw a person wearing a dress that said “I like to fuck kids” I would judge that person for that.
He’s clearly, at best, extremely paranoid and shouldn’t be given a weapon.
His vest doesn’t say “I want to shoot people” - I don’t think that’s a fair comparison. Having a badge with a swastika on it tells more about person’s ideological views than a full mall ninja outfit does.
Yeah no, this isn’t fucking laser tag, we’re talking about weapons of war designed to kill human beings. People like this need to be kept as far away from them as possible.
He can be mocked. He made tragic and anti-social fashion choices. Fashion absolutely can be criticized. Fashion is a way we COMMUNICATE and the things we SAY IN PUBLIC are fair ground for criticism.
This isn’t an expression of his sexuality, or his religion, or anything else that deserves a protected status. It’s not like he came in the only suit he owns and people are making fun of it for being shabby. This is an expression through intentional fashion choices of his politics and his worldview. It’s para-militaristic larping in public, in a professional setting, with people who don’t want to play with him. And we can say that it is fucking shit. I genuinely don’t understand your problem with that.
Look, there is a guy up thread body shaming and another guy denigrating people with ASD. Gowan, have fun. But get a grip.
A disingenous comparison. It is almost like these are two completely different things with different contexts. Of course we should shame this potential mass shooter for this.
This is the exact same logic people use to paint trans people as perverts or potential rapists - not because of anything they’ve done, but because of the stereotypes their appearance triggers in others. You’re just doing mental gymnastics to deal with the cognitive dissonance of holding two conflicting views at the same time.
You can tell things about people by the way they dress and the way they look in general. This guy’s decision to dress like that screams that he’s going to pull a gun when there is no need to. You know this, but you’re doing mental gymnastics trying to deny it because of trans people being persecuted by morons.
No, you can’t tell - you’re making assumptions. That’s exactly the same logic people use to justify shaming trans people, Muslims, or anyone else who “looks” like a stereotype they fear. Everyone convinces themselves their stereotype is the special exception. If you’re okay with that logic here, then you’ve basically conceded that appearance alone is fair grounds for public shaming across the board.
And the ratio of people dressing like this to actual mass shooters is so vanishingly small that your assumption is going to be wrong virtually every single time.
Yes these are assumptions and yes there’s always exceptions. For example, this could be a publicity stunt, maybe he was taking the piss. But this case here is not the same as making generalizations about groups of people based on looks. It’s not the same as thinking that because someone is dark skinned and has a beard they’re a terrorist. There are different kinds of conclusions one can relatively safely reach based on outside appearance. For example, if you see someone with cauliflower ears you can safely assume that they engage in some sort of wrestling, jiu jitsu martial arts sort of thing and conversely it might be a good idea not to initiate a physical confrontation.
My point is, drawing conclusions and forming a rough profile of someone based on looks is a natural process and one should not shut it down. Just keep an open mind at all times.
This particular guy in the picture is not profiled based on gender, nationality etc. It’s the context of the class subject and the very particular attire that make people jittery. Not saying don’t give him the benefit of a doubt, but I do think you can pretty safely assume that he is probably not the most responsible person to give a lethal weapon to. That’s all.
I don’t necessarily disagree with that. You can make educated guesses about people based on appearance - it won’t always be right, but it’s not something to ignore either. At most, it’s grounds for suspicion, not for treating those assumptions as fact. To me it seems far more likely this guy is just socially awkward and thinks he looks cool or badass. I wouldn’t feel comfortable making fun of him for that - it just feels mean.
Fair enough, but this is not about making fun of him, it’s about giving him a gun or not…
Edit: love a level headed discussion btw, kudos! It’s so rare these days, people just downvote instead…
Yeah, well, I’m from a country where concealed carry permits don’t even exist. The only people with guns are basically the police, military and hunters. If someone showed up dressed like that to apply for a gun permit here, I’d personally see it as a huge red flag. But I have different standards for the US, where things are already quite different to begin with.
I enjoy a good sparring session too. It’s nothing personal - it’s just a shame so many people take it that way.
This is a safety training session, it’s inappropriate to wear tactical stuff like you’re going to get in a fight.
Looking at him, I’d say there’s a high likelihood he’s autistic. We’re generally not the best at judging what’s “appropriate” in a social setting. There’s nothing wrong with going up and telling him directly, but shaming isn’t helpful - especially when it’s done behind his back.
Why are you bending over backwards to defend this shit? It’s bizarre…
When people (usually disingenuously) harp on about “mental health funding” after some mass shooting event, this is the shit they’re supposedly talking about. These are the people we are supposed to be flagging before they get the go ahead to fucking conceal carry.
It’s not a joke, giving this guy guns could literally mean life or death for people. I think it’s OK to maybe be extra cautious when it comes to weapons designed to end human life. But that’s just me.
Because I’m willing to stand behind my principles even when the entire mob is against me. If there’s one thing I despise in this world, it’s bullies, and that’s what I’m calling you all out on. All you have seen is one picture and you’ve decided that he’s a future school shooter and a nazi. That is absolutely ridiculous leap to make. For all I know he could be a perfectly decent human being with severe case of lack of situational awareness and social norms. I’m however willing to grant him the benefit of the doubt and defend him from the blood thirsty mob even at my personal expense because I think it’s the right thing to do.
Sometimes it’s good to re-evaluate those beliefs in light of new arguments that maybe you hadn’t considered. Nobody is going to judge you here, it’s ok to change your mind.
Still not interested in being a bully, sorry.
There’s a lot of research showing a link between autism and mass shootings. It’s not a cause, but there’s a link
Mass shootings cause autism!
Looking at him? Autistic? From a picture? Get real lol
Good argument.
There is no “autistic look” and people with autism often have sensitivity issues, meaning coarse clothes that bind at the joints aren’t likely to be chosen by them.