you people do understand it is fake, and if you zoom on the top right eye, it is not the same as bottom right, right?
ok, so to my surprise, it seems to be possible. the difference in the eye may be result of multiple layers of shitty jpeg compression.
the author has more pictures on his web - https://www.pjvphotography.com/Fauna/Pikas
Again, my point is just as valid as the person
again - no, it is not. you don’t even understand the point.
anecdotal evidence is not very rigorous proof (though i assume there is not much formal research done in this area), but that is not the point.
see, while person claiming he never met a vegetarian doing that can indeed confirm the fact, you have no way of confirming majority of vegetarians you met were doing that. because you have no way of counting the vegetarians you met not doing that.
so while the other person can confirm the low number, you have no way to confirm your perceived high one. your argument fails to work even in the framework of the anecdotal evidences.
but has met multiple non-vegans spamming pictures of meat at vegans to… try and convert them. Are you kidding me? Who the fuck does something like that
lot of meat eaters. it is just that you do it so habitually you don’t even realize you are doing that. you will just come to an image of a cow saying “hey, my steak is coming” thinking you are funny.
here you have few of them, who just felt the need to share their steak or stupid joke without being asked:
vegans share their thoughts when it becomes topic of the conversation - it is really the meat eaters who will shout out of the blue “uh uh, mah steak!”, because they feel everyone needs to hear it.
it is similar to when people say “you know, i don’t mind gays, but do they really have to shove it to everyone’s face on their pride parades?” without realizing that the fucking carneval in rio is exactly that - a straight pride parade - you just don’t realize it, because it is “normal” to you".
none 🤷♂️
your entire point is bullshit. you have no idea how many vegetarians, who did not bother to share their thoughts with you, you met.
and you don’t want it full of scratches, since cover glasses and protection cases will probably be quite complicated for these monstrosities?
vegan, crossfitter, linux user and rapsberry pi owner walked into the bar, ordered a beer and minded their own business, but dave mortis really had a need to tell us about it.
they are responsible for the challenges, as is the rest of the population. it is just these challenges are rarely direct consequence of someone’s sexuality.
The word you are looking for is “robust”.
As Taleb explains in his book, antifragility is fundamentally different from the concepts of resiliency (i.e. the ability to recover from failure) and robustness (that is, the ability to resist failure).
i have read it all hoping to find out what he is talking about… instead, the blog post ended 🤷♂️
don’t call me house.
Pick a “must get out of bed before this” time. For me it’s 9am. Pick a time 2-3 hours before that. For me, best was 6:30am Go to bed and be asleep at least 6 hours prior to the first alarm. I often can’t do this but I try.
your “trick” is to intentionally rob yourself of 1/3 of your available sleep time? that is the worst trick in the history of tricks, ever.
tweet is from 2020. this was original, full-fledged human stupidity of some linked-in manager.
You and one other person changed the conversation
oh, did we forget to ask you what kind of conversation is allowed? 😂
that by blaming women
stating a fact is stating a fact, not “blaming anyone”.
wtf, how much time did someone save by cutting these hands like this?
And if these guys don’t take no for an answer, then women should cover their drinks,
you can cover whatever you want, it is your drink. this discussion is about the fact that they found women that said yes and therefor allowing them to spread their genes. miller - 3 kids, hagseth - 4 kids, vance - 3 kids.
jeez, you ran away fast, you sore loser.
no, you are just making up bullshit just so you have something to get mad about. he is saying if no woman would spread legs for these assholes, they would not reproduce.
yes, it would be nice if they weren’t assholes in the first place, but since they are, there is one more threshold where spreading their assholism(is that a word?) onto another generation can be stopped.
that’s just a fact, there is no misogyny, so you climb back of your high horse before you fall down and hit your head.
and you do realise it ALSO involves the mother, right?
i think your argument stays. photography is a mix of lot more things and attributes than just resolution.