Ummmm… According to YT, about 50% of new videos is AI generated (20% AI slop, 30% AI brainrot, don’t ask me whats the difference), and some industry analytics expect that to grow to 90%>

Huh? That is the literal opposite of what I said. Like, diametrically opposite.

The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode. There’s no semantic retrieval step.

No, that’s exactly what you wrote.

Now, with this change

SUMM -> human reviews

That would be fixed, but will work only for small KBs, as otherwise the summary would be exhaustive.

Case in point: assume a Person model with 3-7 facts per Person. Assume small 3000 size set of Persons. How would the SUMM of work? Do you expect a human to verify that SUMM? How are you going to converse with your system to get the data from that KB Person set? Because to me that sounds like case C, only works for small KBs.

Again: the proposition is not “the model will never hallucinate.”. It’s “it can’t silently propagate hallucinations without a human explicitly allowing it to, and when it does, you trace it back to source version”.

Fair. Except that you are still left with the original problem of you don’t know WHEN the information is incorrect if you missed it at SUMM time.

The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode

Oh boy. So hallucination will occur here, and all further retrievals will be deterministically poisoned?

So… Rag with extra steps and rag summarization? What about facts that are not rag retrieval?

A very tailored to llms strengths benchmark calls you a liar.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-flash-everything-you-need-to-know (A month ago the hallucination rate was ~50-70%)

I want to believe you, but that would mean you solved hallucination.

Either:

A) you’re lying

B) you’re wrong

C) KB is very small

Thanks, appreciate it.

It could be cognitive bias (because of the words around it), but the girl on the screenshot does look a bit manly to me (but it also can be lighting, angle, makeup, hair, scales and horns; after all those are the tools of drag and I’m not an expert at gendering peeps. Fortunately my native language has gendered names, verbs and nouns so misgendering someone after their first sentence is gramatically improbable)

I’ve noticed this on my main page and am here to get educated: what is the meme about?

I’m assuming the meme is about her being male presenting and hit with male pronouns from strangers who assume the gender visually, while the OP would prefer to be addressed by female pronouns (I’m not sure how said strangers should know that though, but that’s not the meme point)?

Or is it a meme about being stuck in the process and however she tries she’s still male presenting for reasons unknown to her?

My only question is - would the issue be solved if you followed the manual properly?

Can I have some more, please?

Didn’t he knew by that time that there were also other creatures in the castle? And IIRC correctly by that time J was getting weaker, so I thought he thought he was hipnotised to think he ate, while in reality he was fasting.

thorn only sometimes?

Because that person is young and experimenting with different shits.

Source: I remember when I was young and my behaviour then.

men […] view relationships as a transaction

Meanwhile all the studies showing numbers (and reason behind them) of women who view relationship and sex as a transaction and trade sex for something, including a man being nice to them: Am I a joke to you?

• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4875790/

• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6217550_The_Factors_Influencing_Transactional_sex_Among_Young_men_and_Women_in_12_Sub-Saharan_African_Countries

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953609004651?via=ihub

(And more studies on “sugar daddy”, e.g. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33433242/ )

Tldr: it’s not even overgeneralization, it’s diminishing the female agency in the trade. Which I think is worse.

I need an adult to explain that to me like if I’m 5 years old.

deleted by creator

So… A mediocre story at best?

Because AI can make 10 commercials in the same time traditional creators can make 1

Famously Cola Christmas commercial took more time and money to create than a traditional ad would?

Except it was France in 1791.

Still, technically it’s right. Since USA are not at war with Russia, this is literally piracy.

All the science says don’t let your cat out.

Not really, no.

Cat wellbeing doesn’t say that. Cat depression rates in high enriched indoor environments neither. Keeping the cat indoors is like keeping the people forced to stay in home during Covid - it has negative wellbeing consequences.

Pointing at one specific stat and ripping it apart and claiming victory is exactly how we allowed climate change to just slip away for over 60 years now.

What the heck are you talking about? What stat? There are studies that show that the cats kill mostly rodents (Lowes et al.), and that average bird prey is old or sick. The biggest problem with bird population dropping is not invasive cat species, but invasive human species.

Bird loss is a function of habitat shrinking, climat change, pesticides and pollution. Any fix must focus on that instead of a cheap scapegoat. Do you know how I can tell that? Because the birds are dropping world wide (over 66% of bird species are in decline), outside of outdoor cat heavy areas you seem to want to focus on.

Plastic straws didn’t cause the climate change.