geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 6 months agoDemocrat reformists finding out that Democrats will only play dirty against the left.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square347fedilinkarrow-up1827arrow-down125cross-posted to: libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1802arrow-down1imageDemocrat reformists finding out that Democrats will only play dirty against the left.lemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square347fedilinkcross-posted to: libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squaregoferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up19·6 months agoOr just ignore the results
minus-squareyucandu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·6 months agoWhen have Democrats ever ignored the results of an election?
minus-squaregoferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 months agoThe dnc had argued and won in court that they don’t actually need to follow primary results since they’re technically a corporation https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/
minus-squareyucandu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·6 months agoThat’s about party primaries, not elections, and it doesn’t say anything about results, just that their chair was “biased”.
Or just ignore the results
When have Democrats ever ignored the results of an election?
The dnc had argued and won in court that they don’t actually need to follow primary results since they’re technically a corporation
https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/
That’s about party primaries, not elections, and it doesn’t say anything about results, just that their chair was “biased”.