• Beanie@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s half-right. Upper-case letters aren’t pluralised with apostrophes but lower-case letters are. (So the plural of ‘R’ is ‘Rs’ but the plural of ‘r’ is ‘r’s’.) With numbers (written as ‘123’) it’s optional - IIRC, it’s more popular in Britain to pluralise with apostrophes and more popular in America to pluralise without. (And of course numbers written as words are never pluralised with apostrophes.) Acronyms are indeed not pluralised with apostrophes if they’re written in all caps. I’m not sure what you mean by decades.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      By decades they meant “the 1970s” or “the 60s”

      I don’t know if we can rely on British popularity, given y’all’s prevalence of the “greengrocer’s apostrophe.”

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because otherwise if you have too many small letters in a row it stops looking like a plural and more like a misspelled word. Because capitalization differences you can make more sense of As but not so much as.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          As

          That looks like an oddly capitalised “as”

          That really gives the reason it’s acceptable to use apostrophes when pluralising that sort of case