- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- music@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- music@lemmy.world
We should all be using Tidal, fuck Spotify
Checked it out. Not a fan. You can’t even browse their catalog until you’ve given them credit card info, but from what I can gather, their selection is pretty lacking outside of the genres they choose to focus on.
No “we” shouldn’t.
I mean “we” shouldn’t pay a subscription to any service whatsoever, and support our favo(u)rite artists directly (if this happened, and only 1/50 did the support, the artists would still be making more than they currently do).
But even if “we” are not of that opinion, “we” SPECIFICALLY shouldn’t be using Tidal. Literally any other genuine service with a lossless tier (or lossless only) is better, unless it’s “audiophile”-first, then also avoid.
I bet this idea was brought to us by the same person that was responsible for all of those messengers Google dis a few years back in sort succession.
Who asked for this? What’s better about it than just sending it via text?
more data for spotify, and more lock in
instead of a sharing id in the link that doesn’t withstand secondary sharing, removing, etc, they now get who sent you the link, whether you opened a link sent to you, how long, etc. also encourages people to actually use the follow feature
instead of your friends sending you spotify links in whatever platform that you can go look up on a different music service, you have to use spotify to get their messages
I just miss the friend activity panel. that’s as far as the social features should go. maybe it’ll get some love with this
This feels like a desperation move. Like the early 2010’s when every company was trying to be the next MySpace or FaceBook by integration social features.
Lock in. They seem to worry that people are unhappy with them.


