Microsoft boss Satya Nadella will earn a wallet-busting $79.1m (£60.9m) this financial year, up 63 percent on his compensation for 2023.

The huge boost to Nadella’s pay in both cash and stock, announced by Microsoft last night, comes after a positive year overall for the company’s financial revenues - but a turbulent 12 months for its employees.

2024 has seen two mass layoffs at Microsoft, with 1900 staff laid off in January, before a further 650 Xbox employees were shown the door in September.

  • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I remember whn he first came on the scene, everyone was talking about what a genius Satya was-- for copying AWS’s business model. Tnen he stated women should not ask for raises in 2014. This is what you get when you put someone in charge who was raised and educated inside India.

    This is not India and we dont want it to become like India.

  • m3t00🌎 voted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    while trying to buy a license they claimed i needed a subscription to 365 garbage first. hung up and installed linux.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Remember, he’s the real victim here, he had to sign off on all those layoffs, he’s going to have to live with that decision…

    …in one of his multiple mansions.

    He gets paid that much because he’s one of the few people on earth who can make those kind of tough choices. The poor guy must be weeping into his caviar.

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Our CEO announced layoffs recently and then even more recently sent a follow up email complaining about how people were complaining about it and saying how hard it has been for the executive team. We’re a small company and I get the pain they are feeling due to financial constraints but at the end of the day we work for money and they are taking home 3-4x as much as anyone else each month while making all the decisions about how money is spent. It’s hard not to become resentful.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        3-4x is in the fair region still. Do you think Microsoft employees make 20-30 millions each? (3-4x less than the CEO)

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly, they were labor heavy and he fixed a problem which resulted from gross over hiring. Sounds like he’s doing a good job.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The trap where the thing you’re saying is totally valid and accurate but it’s not the thing to be talking about. I don’t know where this thinking comes from or what it’s called, but I notice it within conservative groups (probably because I’m critical by default of those ideas). It reminds me of BLM protests and how Ben Shapiro was talking about damage to property and business owners when the actual issue and discussion to be had is entirely different. It just serves to support the problematic behaviour that people are trying to change.

        So yes, there was a surge in demand and they over-hired and letting people go is the right choice, but the whole situation is fucked and the optics of this kind of raise is dogshit.

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean, yeah. Isn’t that what we would like here? To not have to work if we don’t want to and yet tech progresses steadily, industry still operates, the world continues moving while people are free to engage in their desired pursuits?

          • naeap@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Not If the profits are in the hand of a single owner, who relied on his workers to get to this point of automation and profit

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            As long as they’re generating profits then that wealth will not go to the people who lose their jobs. They’ll just be a surplus population.

            • Potatisen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              *in America

              Americans have to realise there are other ways to run a country. What’s going on there isn’t normal for the rest of the world.

              • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Most Americans have never owned and will never own a passport, and they dont read much. 60% of them live paycheck to paycheck too. So they dont know and they dont have the time or energy to care.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                Profits by definition only go to the owners and investors. Once they’re seized by the government they’re no longer profits, they’re company expenses.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes. Those laid off workers aren’t going to a world where they’re free to engage in their desired pursuits. They’re making hard decisions to keep their family alive. That second part is important.

          • Maeve@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            If everyone has all their needs adequately met and excessive 79 mn annual salaries are non-existent.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They were labor heavy because they (and all the other tech giants) overhired during the pandemic assuming that record profits would continue forever. Then they had Surprised Pikachu Face when that didn’t happen. That’s not doing his job. It should have been obvious the spike was temporary.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      We can’t even get people to go outside and meet live humans for sex anymore, everyone has switched to online apps for dating. People order food and groceries because we learned from Covid we don’t need to actually interact with other people.

      Does anyone actually expect us to mobilize and topple powerful financial institutions? We have the most comfortable society on Earth in the US. Despite how miserable everyone is, nobody wants to leave their soft chairs and giant computer monitors and immersive video games and discord chat channels where you can mute and block anyone you don’t like. The only thing that could possibly change our course at this point would be some transhumanist/singularity nonsense like artificial general intelligence being developed and wrecking the economy.

      But that’s tech being developed and controlled by the wealthy elite, so my hopes faded long ago.

      • rocky1138@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sorry, the first sentence in your reply is wrong. I’ve literally spent the last two weekends going out and meeting people. If you don’t go outside, that’s on you.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Maybe someone can make an app, so I can have someone paid at an insultingly low hourly rate to go protest/riot in my place?

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          already done.

          "Crowds on Demand is an American publicity firm that provides clients with hired actors to pose as fans, paparazzi, security guards, unpaid protesters and professional paid protesters.[1][2][3] The company operates in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Las Vegas,[4] New York City,[1] Washington, D.C.,[5] Iowa, and New Hampshire.[6] "

          Theres also “Rent a Family” https://charactersforhire.com/rent-a-family/

            • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I’m seriously considering rent-a-family. My relatives can occassionally be ‘unprofessional’ and I see that for a small fee I dont have to put up with that sort of bullshit anymore.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            2.49 extra for assured personal rioter. Otherwise you’ll get the standard service where your rioter may have another riot to attend to first.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    And I bet he does less work in a day than every single one of the people who were laid off to fund his pay

      • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right, but the whole point of a corporation is to benefit insiders at the expense of the owners, employees, suppliers, customers, people that breath air, dolphins, platypi, etc.

          • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Nah, maybe in terms of stock price temporarily. But these layoffs are all anti value by destroying institutional knowledge, employee loyalty, etc. C suite fucks don’t know anything about their businesses and these sorts of moves always fuck owners in the end. Look at boing, GE, etc. When these Jack Welch types get into management they always fuck over the long term owners and get very rich doing it.

            Then again, Im a weirdo that believes in equities having long term intrinsic value so don’t listen to me.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Lemmy, stop upvoting this BS, you jealous basement dwellers.

      Say all you want about unfair pay, but those CEOs work absolutely mad hours and the most insane schedules you can possibly imagine.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every time a big company lays people off I always try to remember that it’s not because they aren’t making enough money as a company. It’s because the “important” people want more money.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      He get this pay becuase he laysoff people.

      Executive compensation is structured around this.

      He wouldnt bother withnthe layoffs if his comp didnt improve…

  • Maeve@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Fire the CEO and hire back the best with pay rises, if they’re willing. JC, MS, get a grip on yourselves.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What a miracle! He must work that much harder than everyone else there! I’ll bet A.I. could never do as good a job as he does!

    I almost forgot… I heard his marbled meat will taste better than many other breeds of billionaire, especially when slow-smoked over Mesquite. I hope we are able to taste that one day.