• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Only twice? How about 4 times as thick?

      If I could have a phone that lasts 4-6 days without a recharge, take my money!

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Only twice? How about 4 times as thick?

        I just measured my iPhone 16 Pro’s thickness with a caliper, too lazy to read the actual specifications, got around 8-8.5mm. If we multiplied 5.6mm (iPhone 17 Air) by 4 that would be 22.4mm which is nearly 7/8” thick.

        That would be an absolutely brick to lug around personally, I can barely fit my current phone with its otter box in my pocket as is and comfortably sit down.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I meant four times as thick as that new ultra thin design, but I’d even that that one you just said.

          If that means I only need to charge once a week, I’m in

          • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I meant four times as thick as that new ultra thin design,

            Yes, to which I responded in my original comment with:

            If we multiplied 5.6mm (iPhone 17 Air) by 4 that would be 22.4mm which is nearly 7/8” thick.

            You’re talking almost a full inch.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      EU should mandate removable back phones like we used to have. Not this hot glued shit, save that for Tesla trucks.

  • Oberyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Like the blue colour , but don’t understand appeal of ultra thin phones

    Remember my 1st reaction to macbꝏk airs I think , my very 1st thought wasz “unbelievably fragile , who would use this , what if you drop it”

    IMHO there’s sweet spot of phone thickness

    • Just thin enough to be comfortable to hold without feeling like shattering into zillion pieces if you drop it
    • Just thick enough to (feel solid in hand|lay flat on table|have all necessary ports) without being tꝏ uncomfortably heavy to hold in 1️⃣ hand
    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are making stupid big phones to set themselves up for when they invent the folding screen models in 2026. Folders are great, but others have been making them for years.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      people who think owning apple is a status symbol. that’s who.

      and it’s the majority of consumers. apple has a very high attachment rate/image for the US consumer. especially among the upper middle class where not having an apple product/iphone is considered a mark of poverty.

      • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This, unfortunately is universally true. It’s pure superficial nonsense, but such is a large % of humanity.

  • C1pher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thin… is this their definition of thin? That fucking camera will be a balancing problem.

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    After seeing this model was getting the A19 Pro, I was half expecting the Pro to get the M5. Honestly, depending on thermals and size, that could work.

  • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Only the 1 camera? And still the full width camera bump? And it’s a full width camera bump that won’t sit flat

    • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      They tried for a few years and it obviously didn’t sell very well. People want large screens.

      Personally, as much as I like the idea of it and missing my iPhone 5, I couldn’t bring myself to buy a Mini.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The mini was quite a compromised phone. And I get it, they have to make it look good. They don’t want some thick ass small phone with an apple logo on the back. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what I want.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      For every person who likes small phones, there’s a thousand people who’d rather buy a 7" behemoth. I’ll be using my 13 mini for as many years as I can, but we’ve lost the battle :(

      At least the Air is probably more comfortable to use than the others

  • sbird@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    so smaller battery (meaning you will need to replace it earlier, which is bad), larger screen than the base model while having a smaller capacity (making battery life even worse…) compromised cameras (no ultrawide and no telephoto, “optical quality” crop in does not count…), compromised speakers (only the amplified earpiece speaker?), possible durability issues (which may be partially remedied with a case, but that defeats the point of a thin phone…), worse thermals (esp. with the “Pro” chip, albeit one less GPU core, also will make battery life extra worse. iOS 26 is sure to make the thermals worse too…), and more expensive.

    For what, a phone that’s a few mm thinner?

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      For what, a phone that’s a few mm thinner?

      so you drop it faster, so then you have to buy a thick rubber case. Smart phones are stupid.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      To me the only purpose of this is to beta the thin design before a folding phone. Other than that, it’s kinda dumb.