• CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s more than important. It’s vital to me. I host TV series ripped from discs on my NAS through HTTP and play them back on another machine.

    For years I used an extension which sends the URL to VLC for playback via HTTP. Nowadays I got rid of the extension and just drag and drop. That doesn’t mark the link as clicked, though. It’s hard to track the progress this way.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Let’s just say there were times I opened the browser after a long day of work just to enjoy an episode or two to prevent mental breakdown.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It feels like using a browser to play video always take wayyyy more resource than a video player. Sending a link to vlc seems like an optimal option to me.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You are not wrong. However, how did MP4 get supported in the first place? Before 2010s, the expected user behaviour was still downloading an MP4 and play with a native player. Why the big gap between MP4 support and MKV support?