• marlowe221@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Beat me to it.

      What’s the meme for when the documentation is two years out of date?

      Or when the documentation IS up to date… but the last 4 versions of the docs are still online and look exactly like the new version with no obvious sign of which version they are? (Looking at you, Microsoft)

  • Goretantath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, thats how i learned to use a computer, was moms so the manual was gone by the time i used it anyway.

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The funniest thing to me is that any good manual would just say “DO NOT USE SOCKS AND FLIP FLOPS SIMULTANEOUSLY”

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Reconfabulate the tridepodictaphone by nabulizing the fromgulan with kreevus. If stufingus brawes, then hyfangle the natriuminutaur.

      Basic 17th year psycoders can do this.

  • Dew@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I enjoy it more to figure out on my own. Kinda like disassembling stuff to see how it works and then put it back together. Reading the manual is like copying answers

  • Safeguard@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    And thereby learning more about what the program can do then the original dev even knew it could.

    This is a weird picture of that important process though.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Then you look back at your notes a couple years later and you’re like “I still don’t understand wtf I did it that way”.

  • Kystael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Then the doc is so complicated that you spend hours reading stuff just to understand if the page is actually related or not. Then at some point you get bored try something randomly and it works.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Joke’s on you, the docs don’t exist or are so outdated that they don’t even compile

  • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    The documentation is usually dog shit.

    The corporate culture does not allow appropriate time for the documentation as it is considered something that cost money without a quantifiable gain.

    It permeates in the FOSS space as well since writing good documentation is a skill and it is not fostered in corporations. So devs start great projects with terrible documentation.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      One way to contribute to FOSS is to improve bad documentation. You are correct, of course, and lazy devs write bad code if they do not cultivate good documentation - imho.

    • ChogChog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Does anyone know of any good resources on writing good documentation? It’s a thing I’m weirdly passionate about and absolutely want to get better at for my own sanity and for others as well if I can contribute.

      But it seems like it’s a very under discussed subject…

      Veronica Explains has a really good video talking about how much of a dead skill it is now from the standards it used to be.