What would you rather call them? I feel like you might as well be saying that cruise control is unnecessary jargon and is confusing to new drivers… Okay but would calling it acceleration latch be any less confusing for new drivers?
The defining characteristic of a new user is that they are unfamiliar with the system. You are never going to be able to reason around those who don’t want to learn something new.
It doesn’t matter how long something has been around if you are new to it.
Federation is a very old word that was, among other things, used to describe the creation of the Internet when the existing networks were integrated under Internet Protocol.
Electronic mail has, as far as I know, always been referred to as such. Even before the first modern email was sent over the ARPANET in 1971.
It doesn’t matter how long something has been around if you are new to it.
But your argument was the reverse of what happened. Everyone has been familiar with providers and servers for decades. Calling it an instance is unnecessary jargon.
I’m going to need a source for your claim that “Federation” has always been used to describe Internet services. The first use I heard was early 2000’s to describe single sign on directory services.
Again, it’s a distinction. To put it another way it’s like saying shoes have existed for ever so “flats” is unnecessary jargon. It is more specific than just shoe, likewise instance is more specific than just server or install. For those who don’t know what an instance is calling it a server isn’t going to be any more educational.
Its use in that context has its own Wikipedia page. The original word is the same root as federal like the US, EU, Russian Federation, Canada, Etc.
To put it another way it’s like saying shoes have existed for ever so “flats” is unnecessary jargon.
The complaint is about marketing to regular people, not using a more specific word that technical people understand.
Lemmy users, "I have a large sign over my store called ‘Flats’ Why don’t I get more people in my shoe store? "
Me, "Have you tried a sign that says ‘Shoes’ ? "
Your claim was that Federated / Instance was used from the beginning of the Internet. That link shows its current application of the word. I’m not trying to be hostile. I’d actually like to know if I forgot/missed something. I was involved in building the Internet 30 years ago.
Regular people freaked out when the start button stopped saying “Start”. My point is that you either want to know what an instance is or you don’t care. It being a different word doesn’t matter to those who want to know.
I’m not sure what part of the article you didn’t understand. Obviously the article came later as Wikipedia hasn’t been around as long even the World Wide Web let alone the Internet. Federation has always been used to describe multiple entities agreeing on a framework. Whether that framework is political or computational or anything else.
My point is that you either want to know what an instance is or you don’t care.
If you want people to use your service, you don’t call it something different than the terminology that’s been in use for 50 years. Everyone knows server and service provider. There is no reason to call it an instance unless you are in IT talking to other IT. I’m not going to tell someone to map an inode when I could say “folder”.
I’m not sure what part of the article you didn’t understand.
The question I have is you claimed Federation has always been used as a term for interoperating Internet services but I don’t remember that. The wiki is about how the word is now used to apply to Internet services. But that word wasn’t used in the past. The big trade show I went to with Vint Cerf was called Interop, not Federate.
What would you rather call them? I feel like you might as well be saying that cruise control is unnecessary jargon and is confusing to new drivers… Okay but would calling it acceleration latch be any less confusing for new drivers?
The defining characteristic of a new user is that they are unfamiliar with the system. You are never going to be able to reason around those who don’t want to learn something new.
What did you call Newsgroups and Email before “Instances” and Federation was coined?
Cruise control has been around for 50 years (email) and only now you want to call it acceleration latch.
It doesn’t matter how long something has been around if you are new to it.
Federation is a very old word that was, among other things, used to describe the creation of the Internet when the existing networks were integrated under Internet Protocol.
Electronic mail has, as far as I know, always been referred to as such. Even before the first modern email was sent over the ARPANET in 1971.
But your argument was the reverse of what happened. Everyone has been familiar with providers and servers for decades. Calling it an instance is unnecessary jargon.
I’m going to need a source for your claim that “Federation” has always been used to describe Internet services. The first use I heard was early 2000’s to describe single sign on directory services.
Again, it’s a distinction. To put it another way it’s like saying shoes have existed for ever so “flats” is unnecessary jargon. It is more specific than just shoe, likewise instance is more specific than just server or install. For those who don’t know what an instance is calling it a server isn’t going to be any more educational.
Its use in that context has its own Wikipedia page. The original word is the same root as federal like the US, EU, Russian Federation, Canada, Etc.
The complaint is about marketing to regular people, not using a more specific word that technical people understand.
Lemmy users, "I have a large sign over my store called ‘Flats’ Why don’t I get more people in my shoe store? "
Me, "Have you tried a sign that says ‘Shoes’ ? "
Your claim was that Federated / Instance was used from the beginning of the Internet. That link shows its current application of the word. I’m not trying to be hostile. I’d actually like to know if I forgot/missed something. I was involved in building the Internet 30 years ago.
Regular people freaked out when the start button stopped saying “Start”. My point is that you either want to know what an instance is or you don’t care. It being a different word doesn’t matter to those who want to know.
I’m not sure what part of the article you didn’t understand. Obviously the article came later as Wikipedia hasn’t been around as long even the World Wide Web let alone the Internet. Federation has always been used to describe multiple entities agreeing on a framework. Whether that framework is political or computational or anything else.
If you want people to use your service, you don’t call it something different than the terminology that’s been in use for 50 years. Everyone knows server and service provider. There is no reason to call it an instance unless you are in IT talking to other IT. I’m not going to tell someone to map an inode when I could say “folder”.
The question I have is you claimed Federation has always been used as a term for interoperating Internet services but I don’t remember that. The wiki is about how the word is now used to apply to Internet services. But that word wasn’t used in the past. The big trade show I went to with Vint Cerf was called Interop, not Federate.
Just because you don’t remember it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen…