fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agoIn this essay...mander.xyzimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down17
arrow-up1393arrow-down1imageIn this essay...mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 months agoI think you are missing some properties of successors (uniqueness and s(n) different than any m<= n) That would avoid “branching” of two different successors to n and loops in which a successor is a smaller number than n
I think you are missing some properties of successors (uniqueness and s(n) different than any m<= n)
That would avoid “branching” of two different successors to n and loops in which a successor is a smaller number than n