Or we could ya know…connect with people. Promote more social interaction spaces and opportunities so people are less siloed and isolated in their own city/town/neighborhoods/houses.
People say “Oh AI, Oh Incels, Oh women are afraid” yes, but people get better at interacting socially by spending more time interacting socially. A “yes man” chat instance doesn’t help anyone learn or grow. And it goes for sex too, you’re not gonna get better if every “person” you’ve been with says you were the best ever and they came 30 times.
AI companies have a vested interest in keeping people alone because it lets them keep using their product. Rebuilding community and connection is the thing that helps people grow.
The post was “in 10 years we’re going to” but the post date is 2015, is the joke
Our sex robots do not look like that, they are the bare minimum functionality of put it in or stick it in
And the Sun will be there to instil moral panic about it, complete with AI-generated Page 3 girl.
No. Also no in 10 years.
Ha I didn’t, but I did come here to say “they were saying that 10 years ago”.
Still more lifelike than bangin yo mamma!
ITT, people that don’t check the date
One of the rare posts that would benefit from an obnoxious red circle.
ITT technical institute
Gonna guess you’re old af and watched those shitty ads as a kid staying home sick and watching daytime TV
How would you know all those details unless you experienced it too?
Lmao indeed I am, I’m 46.
Friendly reminder that the sun (and a lot of other British, Australian and American news outlets) are owned by a milliarder Rupert Murdoch
Just give one of those boston dynamics robot dogs with the arm face thing a fleshlight or dildo.
Hard pass
When you can’t get any with your own species:
We did get the milking machine for sperm donations. I feel like that covers a lot of ground. I gotta wonder how many rich people have one of them somewhere in their house.
You talking “rich” as in “doing pretty well, financially” or “rich” as in “truely wealthy”? Because at some point, I’d imagine that the rich person would just hire a “housekeeper”.
Billionaire Robert Kraft was caught at a low-end “massage parlor” in Florida. It seemed like a slam-dunk case but his lawyers were able to argue that the warrant allowing detectives to place hidden cameras in the rooms didn’t explicitly include recording the videos so the recordings couldn’t be used in court as evidence. Without the recordings of him asking for and receiving sexual services from a potentially trafficked person the prosecutors weren’t able to make a case and he remains a free man, not guilty in the eyes of the law even though what he did became widely known. Still blows my mind that he had the financial resources for any variety of overtly-transactional or less-overtly-transactional-and-perfectly-legal-in-most-jurisdictions relationships with willing participants, yet he chose the really cheap and illegal route with someone who was likely coerced into the action by a third party. Was that part of the appeal?
Did you reply to the wrong comment? I only implied that rich people would probably hire a prostitute of some form, rather than buy a sex toy. What does that have to do with the specific type of sex workers that Robert Kraft chose to visit?
I guess I interpreted your comment to mean they would go for a higher-end arrangement, something more exclusively available to people with large amounts of money, not a cheap arrangement found in an older shopping center.
“sex”
Speak for yourselves
I’ll be having sex with robots in the next 10 years.
10?! Try 1 week
How does sticking my d*ck in the toaster count?
If counts if the toaster is a robot.
You’re not my supervisor!
Jokes on you I’m into that
