• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m confused. Why cows would get extinct, but the chicken eggs for the bread will still exist?

    • nervousnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Umm most white bread does not usually contain eggs; usually flour, water, yeast, oil, and salt. Wheat is apparently self pollinating.

    • BC_viper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Bees no longer pollinating the cows food? I’m assuming they think cows eat only things that are pollinated, and not grass which is propagated by roots.

    • finitebanjo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also the wheat? The shoots might be fine but it wouldn’t produce grains.

      EDIT: Wheat is wind pollinated.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, I’m not saying this is absolutely incorrect, the point is that our food production is heavily reliant on bees which I’m fully in agreement with, but I’m a bit at a loss at how inaccurate this photo is.

    The good news is, I was expecting a thread full of comments falling for this misinformation hook line and sinker, but I’m seeing some push back on the specifics, which gives me hope.

    No, I don’t hate bees or hope they go extinct, but I grew up in a rural farming area of the USA and currently live in a rural farming area of the USA, so I’m aware that not everything that’s missing on the left is entirely dependent on bees.

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I actually heard today on a Climate Town video that clover helps grass to grow and it’s the absence of it from lawns because of weed killers designed to kill it, that we need fertilizers designed to do the same nitrogen fixing that the clover would have done to keep the grass alive. I wonder if it could be argued that the clover needs the bees and the grass needs the clover and the cows need the grass.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wheat isn’t pollinated by insects. It’s self-pollinating by wind.

      On the other hand, I’m reasonably sure cows also don’t require bees to reproduce.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Neither meal looks particularly appealing. Those have to be the most anaemic fries I’ve ever seen, even by the standards of American fast food.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    The kinds of bees in the US are not native to the US. Plants were pollinated in the US long before Africanized or European honey bees were brought over.

    Bigger problem is that we’re killing generalized insect populations, so the quantity of insects is on a decline.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wild pollinators are nice for us home gardeners but they cannot sustain the high production of commercial produce farming.

      If we went to a no-domestic-pollinator system it would dramatically cut food production and jack up food prices.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That doesn’t make premise of the original statement untrue. It’s pretty irrelevant that honeybees aren’t native because their mass pollination does make our food production work the way it does and there’s no way natives can do the job. You might as well just as effectively point out less humans would be better so we don’t need as many crops produced. You might be right, but you’re yelling at clouds.

      As far as killing off too many insects in general is concerned, fuck yes that’s a problem. Our worries revolve around crops, but there’s a shitload of nature that still depends on natural pollinators and other insects to do all kinds of jobs. We kill them off and we’re screwed.

      • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        and there’s no way natives can do the job.

        I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I’m curious if you have relevant peer reviewed information to back that statement up.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope. There are multiple papers citing native pollinators as “gap fillers” for crop pollination, but none suggesting they can take over completely. On top of that, honey bees can be managed like livestock and hives can be moved en masse to where pollination is needed, something that cannot be done with natives.

          • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            To be fair, the crops didn’t exist when the native pollinators were alpha, so the argument is semi-irrelevant. Again, the bigger problem is just that insect populations are failing. The focus should be fixing that, with that comes the bees. Although, that means fixing climate change. Soooo…

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              To be fair? You can’t just say that and remove the point of the discussion - the pollination of modern agricultural methods - and then say it’s Irrelevant. What kind of argument is that?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      arnt potatoes propagated by thier tubers. and through flowers/pollination. things like apples, prunus genus needs bees.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Potatoes do both. Potato seeds are produced from fertilizing potato flowers, and can then grow into new plants.

        But they also spread asexually via tubers, which is way more convenient for farming.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Tubers are used because the type we eat are tetraploids. Tetraploids (aka 4 copies of every chromosome) produce very little seeds. Generally less than 1/10th what a diploid version will. In potatoes it can be a low as 1/10,000th.

          Using tubers transmits all sorts of nasty diseases from one crop to the next. Seeds do too but not as much.

          Diploids are not used commercially because they produce smaller tubers and longer vines.