• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Don’t worry guys, they’re only putting these AI cameras in literally every city and doing it in shady ways without anyone knowing. And false flags like this happen very frequently.

    https://youtu.be/mQxQpzNSNZU

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I should be shocked that eight cops looked at a picture of a black kid holding a bag of doritos in his hand and agreed that it was a gun. why am I not shocked?

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Shows the importance of having a human in the loop.

    And since the police vetted the image properly they shouldn’t be afraid of publishing it, right?

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s crazy how LLM’s and AI have arrived, and immediately started depriving us of dignity, autonomy, and financial independence… And nobody is doing shit about it.

    The largest reason for this is that Donald Trump and the GOP are in power. They’ve actually been eroding what little safeguards had been erected.

    We are all going to suffer while rich assholes destroy this world. All of us except the very, very top.

    • Batmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Best thing is to use Open Source AI if people must since those are way better than the proprietary ones

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Best best thing is to have fucking human oversight over a machine telling us something.

        Sure, having (supposedly) unbiased model running without third-party opaque interference is great, but LLM will always be statistical machines, by design. Nothing it does have value if it’s not checked by something that’s smart enough, and aside from deterministic outcomes we can express with pure logic, that requires a human.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doritos, This much flavor should be illegal.

    You’re welcome lays, I’ll take $200k for the idea.

  • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    No one ever says “sorry” or apologise for stuff like this. Guess its an admitance of guilt or wrongdoing and means you are liable. This way they can fight the court system… Or rather not since the parents probably can’t afford a civil claim.

    Fuck this litigious age we live in.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    A false positive is better then a false negative. The best would be to kill the gun culture so we don’t have to have AI in school, making sure 16 year olds aren’t carrying weapons (only nation where we have this stupid problem).

    • MyBrainHurts@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I’m kinda surprised by the downvotes. I’d rather no guns but if I had to choose between the system missing one and spotting one incorrectly, I’m pretty sure I lean to the false positive.

        • MyBrainHurts@piefed.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wild takeaway, personally I’d rather no guns, no AI but do have a preference for over detection vs guns on school but to each their own!

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          No weirdo, I’m saying I’d rather a few false positives then an actual shooting that could have been stopped but was overlooked.

          Don’t put words in my mouth.

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Firstly, i said it “sounds like that”, not “this is what they meant”, very different things.

            Secondly, what exactly is it you think happens when some of these false positives occur ?

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Regardless of the gun problem, we don’t need to have AI in schools.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh you seemed like you thought it was legal and that we should consider criminalizing it, but you mean we should make it double illegal. Good plan!

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I never for a second thought or said that. But making things illegal doesn’t always solve a problem (which is exasperated by the gun culture). Take a step back and think for a second. You are getting emotional and you aren’t making any sense.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              “Gun culture” and “kids committing crimes” are two separate things. “Gun culture” (if you can even call it that) is IDPA, USPSA, Cowboy Action, skeet (haha), trap, hunting, historical collections, non-historical collections, and defense. Not murdering unarmed kids in a school with a stolen or illegally purchased gun. Incel culture maybe but not “gun culture.”

              This is like saying “car culture” is running over grandmas while drunk driving, rather than cosmetic/performance mods, racing, antique car shows full of Chevy Bel-Airs and Novas, muscle cars, etc. It’s not. “Alcoholic culture” maybe but not “car culture.”

              Maybe you should take that step back.

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The fact that we built a gun culture around treating weapons like cool toys is directly linked to the amount of school shooting. The gun cult really likes to pretend they aren’t related and it’s pathetic.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If you ever talked to anyone actually “in the gun culture” (a phrase that is still laughable to me as if it were a real thing), you’d learn safety is paramount, that they are not toys. This is what you’re saying is responsible for school shootings because they’re treating them like toys? Sure lol. Another example of the basic safety rules from a guy responsible for school shootings, clearly you can hear him saying “play with them wantonly” right there, huh? How bout this guy? Clearly, “gun culture” doesn’t treat guns as toys. Instigram dumbshits are not “gun culture,” the gentleman responding to them here, well, again gun culture isn’t really a thing like you seem to think but he’s as close as we’ll get just like all the other safety advocates in these links.

                  You gonna blame KMFDM next, or?

    • mang0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. The police are well known for using violence against non-violent black people. Imagine what they could do if they believed a black person was armed. I would say that this kid got really lucky.

      Besides the racism problem, many false positives will lead to people not taking the system seriously (see: the boy who cried wolf) and even if they take every positive seriously, it would be a huge waste of resources to frequently send a bunch of cops to do nothing (in best case scenario, in worst case it’ll result in the death of an innocent person).

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        False negative worse case scenario is a bunch of dead kids though. Like I said, I’d rather if guns weren’t in society but you work with what you have and I’d rather a system that was too sensitive then not sensitive enough.

        • mang0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If false positives are frequent enough, police might not take the predictions of the system seriously.

  • regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Omnilert later admitted the incident was a “false positive” but claimed the system “functioned as intended,”

    A black person gets harassed by police without reason. System is functioning as intended, indeed.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I, and most everyone I know, would 100% be crumpling up chip bags into vague shapes of guns and making it a pain in the ass for them to keep checking.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I faintly recall there was a news article about someone who was gunned down by cops mistaking a foil-wrapped sandwich for a gun.