My kid can’t really read yet, but they brought me home a book. This exchange occurred in the first ten pages:
“Papa, that man is as black as ashes, isn’t he?”
Papa laughed. “Dogs and horses come in different colors, don’t they?”
“But he’s not a horse, is he, Papa?”
“No, he’s not a horse.” Papa patted her on the head. “But colored folks aren’t much different.”
I WONDER WHY THIS BOOK WAS FREE IN THE LIBRARY.
(I’m not blaming my kid, they chose it just based on the cover.)


The book (which I’m really hoping takes a turn) is Dark Water Rising by Marian Hale.
This could be an AI sloppy summary, but , maybe it’s not so bad? IDK.
This is different from the blurb on the back of the book, but not by much. I guess the version on the back just doesn’t mention the racism and I didn’t know much about the timeframe. (That part is certainly on me.)
Hiding our children from the past only dooms us to repeat it.
I don’t disagree.
So what’s the problem with a book that portrays the historical period with a degree of accuracy?
I didn’t mean to say there was a problem with accuracy.
I just meant to say this was unexpected.
A book set around 1900 not including open racism would be kinda suspicious. From the summary it sounds bit mature for a kid just learning to read though.
You have to disillusion them since the beginning! Thought we millennials were depressed? Well, our kids will be as much, but twice sooner!