• Muehe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    You don’t have to have blind devotion to something to be a fan of it.

    Fan was originally short for fanatic, so it does actually imply blind devotion. Etymologically at least.

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        For the time being you will have to live with implying blind devotion when using the word “fan” to describe something other than an air circulation tool, since it was recently used in that fashion and sometimes still is. So even if you prefer the descriptive approach to linguistics this meaning is still relevant.

        Side note, purely descriptive linguistics strike me as madness. I mean if the purpose of language is communication then constantly changing the definitions is kind of antithetical to that. Texts would become illegible in decades rather than centuries.

    • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      It evolved through the years. The actual fanatics who don’t accept any criticism for their favorite show/movie/actor/singer/whatever tend to be labeled as stans. At least IME.

      • Muehe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        IME that meaning of “stan” is way younger than I am. I remember it just being a name. And I remember “fan” being used in the way “stan” is now, so I sometimes still use it like that.

        > OldManYellingAtClouds.jpg