I’m still not used to the cumbersome British royal family name, Mountbatten-Windsor, but I’m at least glad there’s at least some consequences for association with Epstein, even if it is relatively small.
Weird that The Guardian has chosen a completely unique new convention for naming this guy in headlines. Everyone else would have their family name in the headline.
It’s so that the readers can tell who’s being talked about at a glance, not weird at all.
Normally I’d question why, since often the strategy is to plead the 5th and run out the clock with boring testimony.
But this arrogant ass, given his BBC interview, should be on prime time.
“Hands across the water.”
So, England has “rules” but the “rich” don’t have to follow them.
Yep. That’s how it works here. Especially if your mummy ran the country.
UK kicked a guy out of the royal family for their relationship with Epstein.
America put a guy in the Whitehouse.
I don’t think Andrew, or Mandleson, faced enough for what they’d done but America proves than the UK could have done less.
Acting like Buckingham Palace isn’t just one giant pederast convention.
He’s going to be the sacrificial lamb…
