OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 days agoEpic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleexternal-linkmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up1501arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1480arrow-down1external-linkEpic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleOldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-28 days agomessage-square172fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-27 days ago So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human. If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
minus-squaredukemirage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 days agoA decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoOK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoThis is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoOK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
A decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
deleted by creator
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
This is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.