where do you stand on the socialist spectrum? i’ll start: my socialist views are a fusion of market socialism, welfarism, georgism and left-libertarianism - i took the leftvalues quiz (as shown in the photo attached in this post), and i got “centrist marxism”. you DON’T have to take the quiz though.

EDIT: i just added the link

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    A democracy deciding to nationalize an industry is not authoritarian to me. I do believe in individual rights and such but that again has to be determined in a democractic process. So any restriction to democracy must come from a democratic process. We are just going to disagree on the spectrum thing because we define them differently.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s absolutely authoritarian, but that doesn’t make it bad or not democratic. Authority is using the power of the state to certain ends.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        you can say any democratic action is authoritarian then. Its not a given that industries are private or that private property is a thing. This is something agreed on democratically. The first thing a democracy has to do is setup its structure and within that is the method to change the structure.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The state doesn’t need to exist forever. The enforcement of will of one part onto another is using authority and thus authoritarian, though I don’t think that’s inherently a bad thing.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            yeah again though that means any action is authoritarian. authoritarian is not about specific actions. Its about action being taken by one or a limited number of folks without input from all individuals. In an ideal type of democracy it would be like the borg and every decision would be decided by a majority of all but realistically you have a republic where representatives are agreed upon to take action. A single president taking action that has been allowed and is legal by majority in creation of the sytem or by their congressional reps and who further assigned the job by a majority in a process agreed to by the majority is democratic. The same action taken by someone who took power by force is authitarian. the action itself is not authoritarian or democratic.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Democracy means rule by the majority, though. It sounds more like you’re trying to narrowly define words your own way.

              • HubertManne@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I already explained the borg vs republic issue. A republic is still a democracy its just less so on the spectrum from direct democracy. Just like a sole king or more authoritarian than a cabal of olgiarchs.