The Soviet system used psychiatry as a weapon by diagnosing political opponents as mentally ill in order to confine them as patients instead of trying them in court. Anyone who challenged the state such as dissidents, writers, would-be emigrants, religious believers, or human rights activists could be branded with fabricated disorders like sluggish schizophrenia. This turned normal political disagreement into supposed medical pathology and allowed the state to present dissent as insanity.

Once labeled in this way, people were placed in psychiatric hospitals where they could be held for long periods without legal protections. Harsh treatments were often used to break their resolve. The collaboration between state security organs and compliant psychiatrists created a system where political imprisonment was disguised as medical care, letting the Soviet regime suppress opposition while pretending it was addressing illness rather than silencing critics.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    At this point I’m starting to wonder whether you’re trolling. You’re equating behaviorism with authoritarianism, which is… Holy shit. I think some reading would help.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Which is what?

      Use your words.

      Happy to entertain counter arguments or refutations.

      Aloof ad-hominem, uncompelling.

      Have you looked into ABA? Look into that, and then take a fresh look at CBT.

      Happy to hear any example of a behaviorist school of thought that’s not authoritarian.

      [PS, 100% not trolling.]