SSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoIt's insidiouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1482arrow-down13
arrow-up1479arrow-down1imageIt's insidiouslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareRecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·edit-22 days agoPNG is lossless and its compression not well suited for photos. It doesn’t even have to be huge to get a photo PNG of that size.
minus-squareDeconceptualist@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 days agoIt’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos. (at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoPNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
PNG is lossless and its compression not well suited for photos. It doesn’t even have to be huge to get a photo PNG of that size.
It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.
(at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
Can be lossless