cm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agoOut of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.fiimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down151
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageOut of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.ficm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoYeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
minus-squareLeonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 months agoFrog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot. That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 months agoAlso frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
minus-squarestray@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-23 months agoChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this. e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output. From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph. Illuminating. It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
minus-squarethe_mighty_kracken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoThanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.
Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.
That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
Also frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.
e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.
Illuminating.
It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.