You’re missing a crucial point: that the system is rotten doesn’t excuse the rotten people perpetuating it and you can’t dismantle the system while keeping the people propping it up in place.
I think you’re making GPs point. However, “the people propping up the system” aren’t just CEOs. This is proven by the fact that a CEO trying to act in a better way is removed. It all comes down to Dodge Vs Ford Motor Co.. The people in power are shareholders and they are the hedge funds of wall street.
Nope. There you go artificially shrinking the issue again. Shareholder power IS a significant part of the problem, of course, but it’s not the entire problem.
The people in power are shareholders and they are the hedge funds of wall street.
Those are other parts of the whole system we need to get rid of, yes. Still doesn’t mean that abusive horses CEOs are powerless or that it isn’t beneficial to get rid of them.
I think you’re making GPs point. However, “the people propping up the system” aren’t just CEOs. This is proven by the fact that a CEO trying to act in a better way is removed. It all comes down to Dodge Vs Ford Motor Co.. The people in power are shareholders and they are the hedge funds of wall street.
No, I’m expounding on mine in order to illustrate that his is too limited.
I KNOW. Hence the farmers and industry associations in my tortured mixed metaphor.
Which is a unicorn that doesn’t excuse the behavior of the horses.
Nope. There you go artificially shrinking the issue again. Shareholder power IS a significant part of the problem, of course, but it’s not the entire problem.
Those are other parts of the whole system we need to get rid of, yes. Still doesn’t mean that abusive
horsesCEOs are powerless or that it isn’t beneficial to get rid of them.