• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Probably with AI slop because they got really stupid really fast in Redmond.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They’re not even towing it, they’re putting it in the lead fully and just dumbly trusting whatever direction it’s going.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “My goal is to eliminate every line of C and C++ from Microsoft by 2030,” Microsoft distinguished engineer Galen Hunt wrote in a recent LinkedIn post.

    “Our strategy is to combine AI and Algorithms to rewrite Microsoft’s largest codebases,” he added. “Our North Star is ‘1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code.’”

    Well, I expect it’ll be exciting, one way or another.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, I expect it’ll be exciting, one way or another.

      This gives the curse “may you live in interesting times” vibes

      • Iunnrais@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Enshittification does not mean making things suck in general. It specifically means the business model of making a good product for users, then making the product bad for users and good for advertisers or data purchasers or retailers or whatever, and then when you have a captured market, making it worse for everyone to squeeze more money faster.

        Microsoft is not doing this. They might be sucking, and making a worse product, but it’s not following the enshittification playbook.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You know it’s going to be successful when they go back to using antiquated productivity measurements like measuring based on lines of code in a time frame. We all know AI is fucking spectacular at generating overly verbose code.

  • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And by which point, by 2032 when my Windows 10 stops updating completely (finally). May just be the time I finally go to Linux.

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I can’t play stuff that requires kernal level anticheat (I know I know, “stop playing those game” no, fuck off). When I can actually play all the games I use to socialise with my very limited amount of friends, sure, but until then, for my use case, Linux is just not good.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      That’s OK. I’m using Linux. Perhaps this will drive more people to Linux. The less people using corporate owned tools the better.

  • Malcolm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Get out your popcorn because this should be fun to watch. They’re already vibe coding all of the value and stability out of their OS.

    As someone who only still has a Window install because Wine can’t handle the CAD tools I rely on, I look forward to the day when Linux becomes a more attractive platform to release professional software for. I’m not holding my breath for the Year of the Linux Desktop but I can certainly enjoy the ride of MS’s self sabotage to get there.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        WinBoat is amazing, but it doesn’t have GPU passthrough yet. That one feature is the holy grail for Windows virtualization on Linux. I hope the WinBoat team can solve it.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m afraid that’s going to be a long way off.

          KVM can do it, but usually only to one kernel. Not sure if you can have multiple kernels handling one GPU.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      TBH he probably knows he is lying, but is making confusing claims in order to push some other agenda.

      Probably firing core people to save money while maintaining plausiblish deniability that this won’t do irrepairable damage.

      Or just to get himself approval for amassing subordinates for a little kingdom, by displaying an ambitious “plan”.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Plans move to Rust, with help from AI

    As if AI could handle the mountains of checks Rust has you account for.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      While I agree that I don’t think that an LLM is going to do the heavy lifting of making full use of Rust’s type system, I assume that Rust has some way of overriding type-induced checks. If your goal is just to get to a mechanically-equivalent-to-C++ Rust version, rather than making full use of its type system to try to make the code as correct as possible, you could maybe do that. It could provide the benefit of a starting place to start using the type system to do additional checks.

      • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The safety designed into Rust is suddenly foreign to the C family that I’m honestly not sure you can do that. Even “unsafe” Rust doesn’t completely switch off the enforced safety

        • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, to quote the manual:

          "[Unsafe Rust allows you to]

          • Dereference a raw pointer.
          • Call an unsafe function or method.
          • Access or modify a mutable static variable.
          • Implement an unsafe trait.
          • Access fields of unions.

          […] The unsafe keyword only gives you access to these five features that are then not checked by the compiler for memory safety."

          https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch20-01-unsafe-rust.html

      • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I truly believe immutable Fedora distros are the answer to windows. I spent years and years on Debian based distros. At the beginning of 2025 I finally switched my daily driver from Windows to an arch based distro.

        Fast forward to October where I finally put Bazzite on my S/O’s gaming laptop, and shit just works. But the real kicker is that I don’t have to worry if upgrading her system will leave it unbootable.

        Look, I love tinkering, compiling from source, and keeping a spare Linux kernel, but windows users don’t want that shit. They yern for flat packs and systems that you can’t fuck up.

        Anyways, fedora atomic, 100% the new meta.

        • StitchInTime@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yep. Atomic doesn’t suit my needs outside of a dedicated gaming machine, but if I help my mom with a new computer, it’s going to have an atomic desktop with KDE. Close enough to windows that she won’t need to learn something new, secure where I won’t have to clean it out every 6 months, and reliable to where she can handle OS updates herself. I just need to be able to run an old version of WordPerfect for her in Wine and she has everything she needs.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          100 fucking percent. I’m loving atomic distros more and more as I use them, despite having to work around limitations/recommendations against installing rpm packaged software.

          Bazzite was actually the distro I chose when I bailed on windows earlier this year, and while I do have my complaints, it’s easily been the best desktop Linux experience I’ve had in multiple decades. I’ve tried a dozen or more times to go to Linux but my graphics card has always been the reason I went back. But between going green and using a distro that has both steam and my GPU drivers baked in, it’s been a fucking dream.

          Like, I love tinkering, coding, and all that fun tech shit. But I also do this for a living, so I want my home system as set and forget as possible. I don’t mind doing troubleshooting on my servers and shit to make hosted services work, but something about having to troubleshoot my main rig just sends me over the edge.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          I really agree. I let my partner try out my steam deck (immutable arch instead of Fedora, but ultimately the same experience. Flatpaks and easy updates). They fell in love with it, so I bought a second one for them. It’s been a year now, running it almost exclusively on desktop mode and using it as a Linux desktop.

          I haven’t even shown them the terminal yet.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is what you get when AI fanaticism combines with Rust fanaticism.

    1 million lines a month is 2-ish line per second. That “engineer” is just someone to blame when things don’t work. They aren’t going to be contributing anything.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean, if this is true and it works it is not too far fetched. You’d mostly be checking that tests still make sense and that they pass.

      Microsoft scientists have worked on a tool that automatically converts some C code to Rust.

      • Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The expensive autocomplete can’t do this.

        AI markering all wants us to believe that spoon technology is this close to space flight. We just need to engrave the spoons better. And gold plate them thicker.

        Dude who wrote that doesn’t understand how LLMs work, how Rust works, how C works, and clearly jack shit about programming in general.

        Rewriting from one paradigm to another isn’t something you can delegate to a million monkeys shitting into typewriters. The core and time-consuming part of the work itself requires skilled architectural coding.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well, in that case they’re overstating their capabilities. Which is not too surprising.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You’d mostly be checking that tests still make sense and that they pass.

        Nah, my experience is most of your time is finding out what parameter or function call they made up because its mathematically a good answer.

    • tyrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I was about to say that surely it’s not just 1 person they are talking about. Then I read, "Our North Star is ‘1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code.’”

      WTF

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This could have been good news, however, Microsoft’s insistance on using AI, and general incompetence even without it, makes me very doubtful this will be successful.

    They are going to try and replace C and C++ written by actual experts a few decades ago, with Rust written by idiots. Expect tons of logic bugs, and very little measurable difference in memory corruption.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      little measurable difference? the last time they rewrote something they replaced the start menu with fucking react

      the difference will be measurable and enormous

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        AI doesn’t reason, so it heavily depends on what’s been presented in the training set.

        Python is everywhere and most importantly whatever you can think exists in Python, from critical bioinformatics tools to somebody learning programming from the first time and posting their prime number finder or sorting algorithm online.

        Rust? Not at that point yet, so the AI fails

        • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          Yeah, for everything I’ve seen it’s just a classical case of overfitment. I only tried it because it was recommended to me by a coworker. It failed at problem solving and choosing comparable dependencies. Completely jarring because like you said, it could likely do it in JS and Python. But clearly not Rust. I often wonder if the code you get from AI is +85% stolen verbatim.