I think its hard to argue against cooperatives. They have a good track record, are member owned, and democratically controlled. Its a form of stateless socialism and a great place to start handing the means of production over to the proletariat.
I like that, sounds neutral enough. It’s interesting to imagine the decision making processes - democratically controlled, stateless society sounds a bit contradictory on the first thought.
Sure, but you’re trying to convince rabid anti-communist/anti-socialist people to accept the ideals under a new name. Don’t give them anything that might preload their expectations.
Time for a rebranding
CapitalismButBetter
I think its hard to argue against cooperatives. They have a good track record, are member owned, and democratically controlled. Its a form of stateless socialism and a great place to start handing the means of production over to the proletariat.
I like that, sounds neutral enough. It’s interesting to imagine the decision making processes - democratically controlled, stateless society sounds a bit contradictory on the first thought.
Nah time for people to think for themselves… But who am I kidding?
Communitism? Societism? Civilizatism? Social securitism? Social safetism?
Communitism is probably too close to communism, auditorially.
well … i’ve heard a lot of people saying “communication is key to a healthy relationship”
and i would say “communication” is auditorially close to “communism” too.
Sure, but you’re trying to convince rabid anti-communist/anti-socialist people to accept the ideals under a new name. Don’t give them anything that might preload their expectations.
Social democracy?
Edit: on a second thought that might also not work, we might need marketing department consultation